doctorow at January 7th, 2014 02:05 — #1
mtdna at January 7th, 2014 02:22 — #2
Dude, you got me all wet, but the big one isn't 47.5" tall, it's 45.7cm.
doctorow at January 7th, 2014 03:01 — #3
noname at January 7th, 2014 03:59 — #4
I can't help but look back at the early days of Makerbot (like this talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq6Vi5Y1RLM&feature=player_embedded ) and be impressed by how far the hardware has come, but also somewhat shocked at how the values of the company have changed. Dropping open source, the recent patent lawsuit, and now pushing Thingiverse to the side--how did these things happen?
peregrinus_bis at January 7th, 2014 04:32 — #5
Please please tell me they don't have onboard DRM. Please.
euansmith at January 7th, 2014 04:34 — #6
All the way to 11
anthonyc at January 7th, 2014 07:42 — #7
Correction: Cory, it was Stratasys, not EOS, that bought Makerbot
ahmed_sayid at January 7th, 2014 08:09 — #8
as mentioned below Makerbot was bought from Stratasys.
Stratasys makes 3d printers in the region of few thousand $.
The obvious road was to drop open source, thingiverse etc.
(feel free to call me leftist or whatever else comes to mind)
anthonyc at January 7th, 2014 11:12 — #9
Thingiverse still exists - did I miss an announcement?
Also, Makerbot decided not to have open-source hardware about a year before Stratasys bought them. And frankly I can't blame them, as long as they still allow people to control and modify their own hardware once bought.
Stratasys' printer cost tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars, it's Makerbot's that cost thousands.
tinyenormous at January 7th, 2014 12:04 — #10
Since no one mentioned it yet. The "completely batshit patent on the totally obvious "invention" of putting see-through sides on a 3D printer" happens to be owned by Stratasys. Who also own Makerbot.
stefanjones at January 7th, 2014 12:53 — #11
Still waiting until they come with a input hopper which turns empty recycleable containers into feedstock.
You'll get a new robot when you've collected 23 more 2 liter pop bottles.
albill at January 7th, 2014 14:06 — #12
ogilvy at January 7th, 2014 15:46 — #13
Sounds like the company values may have collided with reality.
erik at January 8th, 2014 16:23 — #14
It may be that these patents have expired, or that Eos Stratasys, Makerbot's new corporate owner, holds or licenses the patents.
You can't be bothered to find out who it is who bought MakerBot (it takes one visit to Wikipedia) or look up who owns the "batshit" patent..? Do you just rush to publish, like putting "First!" in the comments?
erik at January 8th, 2014 16:26 — #15
The machines have changed a lot between these newly announced ones (post-Stratasys) and all previous generations (pre-Stratasys & open source). Who knew... it takes a lot of $ and the associated business practices that go along with it to make a really nice product. Surprise!
doctorow at January 12th, 2014 02:06 — #16
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.