OK. What I meant was that, using your analogy, you must be born before you’re even accused of murder let alone convicted of murder. I never intended to say that you wouldn’t also have to plausibly have committed murder to be convicted of murder.
I think you must admit that plausibly having committed a murder before being born would be quite a trick.
What does it mean to be “okay with that”? Isn’t being “okay with that” just a subjective conscious experience? If it is, and if subjective conscious experience may just be an illusion, on what grounds do you conclude that you are, in fact, “okay with that”?
If your subjective conscious experience is just an illusion then the act of reading words from a computer screen must be an illusion. If that is the case, then what is it exactly that you are “okay with”?
