Responsible Nuclear would, however, be an excellent bridge
There’s no such thing as “responsible” nuclear. Why did you capitalize it, anyway? No offense, but that makes it sound like an astroturf slogan.
Nuclear is vastly too expensive and it’s not even close to as sustainable as solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, etc. are.
There’s been a non-stop astroturfing campaign to spread the LIE that implementing solar, wind, geothermal, tidal, etc. aren’t possible in the short term. Don’t fall for it.
