doctorow at February 24th, 2014 12:03 — #1
uniqueusername at February 24th, 2014 12:14 — #2
They could have done worse with their flimsy pretense, in wiretapping the office of the German Chancellor and using the excuse "She just happened to be German Chancellor at the time, which is really just a coincidence."
wrecksdart at February 24th, 2014 14:02 — #3
The paper said that the information's source is an anonymous, high-ranking NSA official stationed in Germany.
Interesting. Either brave, given that the list of "high-ranking" NSA officials stationed in Germany can't be all that long, or part of the US' political calculus done in order to scare someone or to obtain some other piece of information. This just seems too weird to be so easily explained as some high-ranking person mentioning it to journalists.
unshaved_weirdo at February 24th, 2014 14:20 — #4
I didn't know there were 320 important Germans, but I guess it's a step up from having just one.
karls at February 24th, 2014 14:32 — #5
I have trouble believing that this was a whistleblower. I think a press release is more likely. Of course the next question is by whom and why.
On possibility is that it is supposed to antagonize the German government and public in a limited and deniable way in order to prove to a domestic audience that nothing really changed and no substantial concessions were made.
Or perhaps for some hidden reason they really want to make fundamental changes and escalate the situation to demonstrate that it is necessary.
doop at February 24th, 2014 15:11 — #6
amsterdammer at February 24th, 2014 15:13 — #7
Is the NSA out of control in that it is leaking, or out of control in that it is an organization more powerful than the president?
tuseroni at February 24th, 2014 15:46 — #8
NSA spooks then cooked up a way of continuing to spy on Chancellor Merkel anyway, using a flimsy pretense unworthy of four-year-old.
"i'm not spying on you. i'm not spying on you. "~nsa
tuseroni at February 24th, 2014 15:49 — #9
out of control in that they are not listening to the people who are supposed to be controlling them.
tachin1 at February 24th, 2014 15:50 — #10
Nothing that is for public consumption can be of any importance, so IF this was a press release, then it probably wouldn't be to provoke a reaction, it would be to placate.
Who and why indeed
Anyway, I don't personally subscribe to this theory of counter-propaganda
boundegar at February 24th, 2014 17:31 — #11
Anonymous whistleblowers? Those losers. If they were real men, they would out themselves on the Tonight Show and surrender to police, to be waterboarded for the next 40 years.
Oh I almost forgot, why do they hate America?
themudshark at February 25th, 2014 05:09 — #12
Those rascals. Just you wait until Uncle Barack hears about this, he will be outraged.
doctorow at March 1st, 2014 12:03 — #13
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.