Amanda Palmer: why fans choose to pay artists they love

Did Amanda Palmer kill one of your loved ones*?

*I mean, I hate that some people cover songs I love too, but (insert song from Frozen soundtrack here)

I’ve found that some people just really want to hate Amanda Palmer.

3 Likes

It’s kind of unbelievable how many people want to hate her — I’m guessing it’s some form of jealousy around the idea that she’s seemingly been able to build an existence simultaneously within and outside of the “typical” systems of social operation. When you sit down and work “by the book” it can be frustrating to see someone go about something differently and achieve success. Some hate also seems to come from a place of misogyny. She’s not perfect as an artist (who is) and I’d expect to see some critique there, but most honest critique seems to be shadowed by a deluge of vitriol.

People are always quick to say that she’s “stealing” from people or “exploiting” her fans, but these are fans who are completely willing to give her money and will jump at the chance to hop on stage with her without a contract. Previous to some of her latest success she was successfully couch-surfing all over the place just on the good nature of fans.

I’ve had the opportunity to talk with her on a few occasions, and she’s just an absolutely pleasant and witty person. There are no ulterior motives at play, and her motivations are all out there in the open. It’s a shame she’s moved on from Boston because that’s killed the odds of being able to bump into her again outside of a performance.

There’s another thing that the haters neglect to mention: Amanda will randomly perform at a coffee shop or other public venue completely free of charge. She not only gets it, but actively participates what she preaches.

4 Likes

If the level of discourse keeps going downhill like this I don’t know if I can take it!!!

/sarcasm

It’s a compliment.

Personally I am happy with the traditional definition - a professional is someone who does it for money, and an amateur is someone who does it for love.

1 Like

I think you’re defining hookers.

You thought hooking wasn’t a profession? It’s usually called the oldest profession.

1 Like

I was hoping so! Thanks!

1 Like

I didn’t have a strong opinion on Amanda Palmer until this:

She supports Jian Ghomeshi and said in a tweet that she kick someone off her stage or from anyplace just because they are "going through stuff "(paraphrased). Because raping women is “going through stuff”.

She can fuck off, for all I care. She’s a rape apologist, rapist supporting asshat. Not to mention the rest of her clueless bullshit already mentioned above.

3 Likes

Huh. A wealthy, privileged person espouses a hardline Conservative economic philosophy of deregulation and free markets. Why am I not surprised by this?

1 Like

Good. But what she did and what she said (which was REALLY dismissive of abuse) was still pretty shitty and hypocritical, considering how she has presented herself as a person. The combination of all her past bullshit plus this doesn’t leave me with warm fuzzy feeling about her. She doesn’t seem particularly self-aware and she seems far more interested in her art than anything else.

Never got the obsession over her, still don’t. Meh.

1 Like

I don’t think so. In fact, I doubt very seriously she’s killed anyone.

I just thought it the height of arrogance to seriously call one’s self a “rockstar”, implying that “rockstar” can be an actual job title, and claiming that being a “rockstar” is now what she is and how she makes her living. If she had pressed her tongue against her cheek even a little bit, I wouldn’t have cared in the least, but there was no indication at all that AP was joking. Again, you may think it an issue of semantics, but Amanda Palmer is no rockstar. I don’t think it’s a title one can bestow on one’s self. But ultimately I’m not THAT worked up about it. I was just, you know, weighing in a little bit.

I rather think that a major part of being a rock star is declaring one’s self one. Isn’t that what Ziggy Stardust did for David Bowie?

2 Likes

Right, but see, if men do it, it’s okay, but once women do that, they are out of line and needed to be shut-shamed and disciplined… /s

2 Likes

But if Bowie hadn’t become a real phenomenon, Ziggy Stardust would only be looked at as the theater piece for which it (he?) had been created. Not to mention that Bowie had already found a bit of success as a performer before Ziggy Stardust. There’s nothing stopping anyone from declaring themselves a rockstar, but if one does so and remains a postal worker, or a CPA, or a teacher, or whatever, it’s either delusion or harmless fun and games. And, in the same way that not EVERY porn performer is actually a porn STAR, not every performer working the rock idiom is a rock STAR. I would concede that Amanda Palmer is a rock performer, though much of her music I wouldn’t even consider to be rock. I wonder if you would be put off by someone declaring themselves to be a genius, especially if they demonstrated nothing of the sort. Now substitute the word rockstar for genius and you might see where I’m coming from.

1 Like

Well, one declares one self a rock star and then one backs it up. Whether one backs it up sufficiently and in the right way (catchy tunes, sales, artistic integrity, outrageousness, etc.) well, there’s a lot of subjectivity involved…

2 Likes

Well, obviously what eliminates the subjectivity is @jaybone23’s “sniff test”.