Thanks for all the replies.
I feel both educated and somewhat embarrassed that this concept challenges me.
Perhaps due to growing up hearing over and over that “crazy people” do bad things…
Maybe they’re just shitty people?
Yet, almost everyone won’t commit mass murder. This is why I’m so tired of “bUt MeNtAl IlLnEsS” being casually thrown around by people on the right and left for that matter. It’s just a cheap way to deflect from the self-inflicted and avoidable societal problems that lead to these things happening including a culture that fetishizes firearms.
The only way that mental health comes into this is because some of the survivors may need therapy.
A few years ago Andy Murray talked about how he became serious about playing tennis as a way to cope with having survived the Dunblane Massacre. Some people thought it was a feel good story when he won at Wimbledon, but sometimes it is just a way to escape the horror that some of us unfortunately experience.
Yup. I read a story on CNN with one of the survivors describing the events in her own words. The mother has a GoFundMe to pay for the child’s medical bills and the therapy she’ll need as a result of this. That’s just so wrong to me on so many levels. #onlyinamerica
from this old 2015 malcolm gladwell piece
In the day of Eric Harris, we could try to console ourselves with the thought that there was nothing we could do, that no law or intervention or restrictions on guns could make a difference in the face of someone so evil. But the riot has now engulfed the boys who were once content to play with chemistry sets in the basement. The problem is not that there is an endless supply of deeply disturbed young men who are willing to contemplate horrific acts. It’s worse. It’s that young men no longer need to be deeply disturbed to contemplate horrific acts.
When a politician raises mental illness as a root cause for these horrific acts, I’m not sure that we should trust them. It could be a deflection from more obvious causes (easy access to guns, for one.) It could be a plea to the voters to allow the state to lock up, neglect, and abuse the usual targets of persecution, on even less pretext.
It’s even more disgusting because even if it were mental illnesses, they don’t want to do anything about THAT either. Some guy with schizophrenic tendencies got away with not being convicted for shooting Reagan and the republican response was to dismantle what mental health systems the government DID have.
Regan had already dismantled mental health care for the most point by that time.
No, they’re neither misunderstood nor misdiagnosed…they’re the end result of a well-oiled machine of hatred and bigotry:
Slate offers up this piece:
which includes this line
This brings us back to the moment, and to the fact that mental health has become a scapegoat, an easy talking point for politicians, pundits, and firearms lobbyists to use to distract us from deeper issues. The problem with this is that it’s just wrong. The evidence does not suggest that mental illness causes gun violence. Full stop. And paradoxically enough, it’s these same elected officials who have also chosen to not do anything to help mental health even as they point their finger at it as the problem.
The linked paper is well worth reading, as it seemingly addresses every aspect of this attempt to blame mental illness,
are people with mental illness likelier to commit acts of violence: NO
are people with mental illness likelier to be victims of acts of violence YES
can psychologists diagnose perpetrators before they act: NO
is there a racist overtone to this insinuation: WHY YES
Also, the people who always use this particular deflection actively degrade mental health services….
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.