i posted over in follow up about how apparently cnet’s bot was plagiarizing existing articles. so currently at least humans are still needed for the seed. ( eta: link to the cnet article )
what will be really weird, i guess, is when - like with @MononymousSean’s dr seuss - ai is plagiarizing ai
separate thought: i didn’t realize till reading the generated posts above just how repetitious gpt can be. space filling variations around what would normally just be a sentence or two. like reading a grade school essay going for word count
