Cops who blew up innocent man's house don't have to pay, says appeals court

Yeah, like that new house he built. Eugh.

2 Likes

Sort of. IANAL, but they cited the “takings” clause, for which Eminent Domain represents the allowed work-around.

http://www.progressivereform.org/perspTakings.cfm

The argument really was that the PD failed to officially exercise eminent domain, and thus violated the 5th Amendment takings clause.

3 Likes

This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.