Smelled like a #slatepitch.
That sounds like âGor fâr the ladiesâ. Creepy, to me.
Also, an affiliate link would simply make Mark but one of the New Pornographers.
Something something disruptive ohhh, yeah! something.
Howâs his singing voice? As good as Neko Case?
Like if porn is something wrong.
Better than Neko Chan, not as good as Necco Wafers.
There we go - candy porn.
Those 3d printers that fuse sugar are not enabling enough homebrew Wonkaâs, IMHO. Self-publish or perish.
Exactly. Just because sheâs not likely to garner much support from the BB commentariat doesnât mean they shouldnât care. If Amazonâs wiling to cook search results for a high-earner author/publisher, imagine how little sleep theyâll loose over doing it to authors you like. Even people who donât give a hoot about authors should be bothered by the prospect of their own searches corralling them towards something other than what theyâre looking for.
[quietly changes career]
Which is a good reason to go to a local bookstore and talk with the people that work there instead. Eff Amazon, a hundred times over.
Amazon is my local bookstore!
And Starbucks is my local coffee shop.
You live in Seattle?
Sorry, I donât care about her specific finances, I care about Amazon cooking my searches due to a conflict of interest. Thatâs egregious anti-marketplace bullshit and deserves to be called out.
Also, Ladywank would be an excellent name for a Britpop band.
It would be interesting to take the $50,000 a month and spend it on marketing elsewhere, but that raises the question of whether AdWords is worth the money either. Neither one seems to provide much bang for the buck.
âAmazon is needling into her marketâ
S/B:
âAmazon thrusts passionately into her market, again and again and again⌠Until she finally blurts out âNo! No more!ââ
I am NOT going to google this at work, but is there financial erotica? I mean, really filled with the nuts-n-bolts of finance, numbers, margins, etc etc etc.
As opposed to pure financial porn, which is what the WSJ puts out.
mmm⌠yeah, babyâŚ
No need for such finesses. We just get fucked.
Many moons ago I worked with a search engine company. It was truly shocking how easy it was to manipulate the search results.
The company I worked with had the ability to load in special thesauruses, for example, a legal one, to help search for related but specialized terms used in your profession.
However, you could use the feature to bias search results. One company that used our software sold wine, and when you searched for âbordeauxâ the ones that would float to the top of the list were the ones with the highest profit margins.
A search for âJaidâ should hit exactly on her name, given that it is not a word in and of itself. So, yeah, someoneâs doing some search engine tinkering.
Can we please stop calling porn âeroticaâ just because itâs for a female audience?