It looks to me like itās being played backwards in that video, if it is meant to be a water ripple.
Would somebody competent be willing to make a cropped gif of the sequence after 0:57?
I hate to use the word āpretentiousā, but it fully applies to this video. The āmysticalā music and lengthy shots lead to the viewer thinking that the mechanism is somehow confusing, rather than being explanatory and encouraging the viewer to ACTUALLY āadapt, create, deliverā as the very briefly screened tagline at the end would imply is the intent.
I was actually expecting a tabletop that oscillated.
Now if somebody would create a full-sized table with leaves in it that moved-up-and down like that, Iād consider it furniture with a real showstopping effect.
Simple and effective. Iād certainly be pleased with it if Iād built it; I wouldnāt mind displaying it in my library as a small kinetic artwork.
(Not yet decided how much Iād pay for it, if I saw it in a convention artshow.)
Mildly arousing.
Totally agree. Focusing on all the cams at the beginning is bass-ackwards. The automaton is wonderful; the video presentation does it a disservice.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
