I think that will depend on how you define and measure success, but to a large extent it’s going to be self-fullfilling prophecy anyway. I personally test far above my actual ability - I can figure out from the phrasing of the questions what the answers should be despite knowing nothing about the subject being tested - and my son is much the same. Because I scored very well on the SATs, Stanford-Binet v2 & 3, and the Weschler cognitive test, I have been given opportunities that are not extended to people without these “paper qualifications”. Yet, I do not think that the particular type of problem-solving ability these tests measured has always been truly critical to whatever successes I have had (although it often did help, I admit!). In fact I think being willing to take responsibility for a problem has mattered more (for me) than being capable of solving it efficiently or even effectively; and I think character usually counts towards success more than book-learning.
Meaning no disrespect to book-learning - I love books. I just don’t like being graded on how well my interpretation of them fits an instructor’s testing regimen.
[quote=“ben_ehlers, post:120, topic:25817”]
OR: Do we recognize that there are greater measures of a person than test-taking or rote repetition, and instead try to work with individuals to best equip them with the tools they need to succeed?[/quote]
Apologies for chopping up your post, but I think that line shows we’re thinking about the same goals, no matter how differently our methods might be constrained. Thanks for giving me another viewpoint to think about!
[quote=“ben_ehlers, post:120, topic:25817”]
My point is that if I see an ostensibly hard-working, earnest student that suddenly falls flat on their face during an exam, I could still come up with alternative assessment that proves they are knowledgable and capable. But do I know for sure that other people will do the same? Will college admission boards be so considerate? Professional accreditation bodies? Government agencies? Most likely not. Do not mistake me; I have seen how rampant credentialism disempowers and alienates people. But this problem is bigger than the classroom, bigger than the education system, really.[/quote]
Very solid points! I have to agree that you as a teacher have to work with a limited set of tools and that your own opinions and values necessarily have a severely limited reach.
The one experience that I have had with an institution of learning that eschewed grading entirely was very positive, though. When my kids left NCCL, we were concerned that their lack of test scores and grades would limit their options for high school. However, NCCL’s been around since the 1970s so all the local high schools (including the private, charter and magnet schools) are familiar with the history of academic ability that NCCL graduates have shown and will happily waive their grade and test requirements. Which makes me think that if you find a better way, you really only have to convince one institution to do a better job, although it might take 30 years before everyone realizes you’ve made a difference.