I've played the Powerball simulator for 1,092 years and have lost 91% of my money

I think he meant Powercall.

Look - it features an app for Yelp!

10 Likes

and HYPERYELP!

4 Likes

I never pay the extra dollar on lottery tickets and NEVER check to see if I would have won.

Printing the “extra” stuff on the ticket whether you buy it or not feels like intimidation tactics.

“What the hell are we going to do with all these Adams?”

“I have an idea!”

3 Likes

just because hoping to win is irrational doesn’t mean it’s insane as long as people can control their gambling. poverty leads to gambling, drinking, drugs, and other reckless behavior that may lead to addiction.

It took me 49,000 years but I finally won $1 Million! It cost me $8 Million to do it however…

3 Likes

Next time try using more money faster!

5 Likes

fastest way to own 1 million dollars? start with 10 million.

2 Likes

I read Steve Martin’s important book: “How I Turned a Million in Real Estate into Twenty Five Dollars in Cash”

4 Likes

They say that the chances of a bomb being on the plane you’re on are astronomical. So it’s best to bring your own bomb, because of the odds of TWO bombs being on it …

5 Likes

Ludicrous speed!

1 Like

Yeah, I can’t wait for season 2 of “Better Call Powersall.”

6 Likes

The payouts for all but the top prize are fixed. If you match 5 numbers, you get a million dollars, regardless of whether the jackpot was $20 million or $1.3 billion. If you match 4 numbers the payout is $100. (And the odds of either of those outcomes is pitifully slim.)

spending 1.5 billion, between now and the next drawing, might do it.

2 Likes

I like to think of it as division: you have: very_small_chance / 0.0 = infinity ( I KNOW it’s not infinity, it’s undefined); so 1 ticket is infinitely better than no ticket.

Similarly, I think of the 2nd ticket as the most cost-effective way to double your odds. Diminishing returns after that…

Maybe I’m saying the same thing as you?

/if this was /r/trees, there’d be a [7] in here somewhere…

1 Like

But wouldn’t the increase in splitting (really the decrease in your winnings) be a very small increase? Seems to be that, sure pseudo-random-number-generators (PRNGs) have flaws, or dice that aren’t obviously tampered with(1) will be so close to “fair”, at least for lotteries in the 10-100million range, it would be very hard to spot?

Some of the flaws in PRNGs seem vanishingly small. Sure, technically, not “fair”. But if the flaws are at the 1-in-a-billion level I think we’d never notice at the lottery level.

I have no evidence or learnings that qualify me in this subject. Just gut feel.

  1. For instance, if a die has drilled-out and paint-filled dots, the 6 side must be lighter(2) or heavier(3)

  2. Assuming they don’t correct for this, and I’m sure they do, 'cause if I thought about it, it’s not that complicated.

  3. Does the extra paint in the 6 dots combined make up for the opposing 1? But now I think the 3 pairs of opposing faces always add to 7… to the dice box!

You use Casino dice, flat faced pips, edges like a razor.

1 Like

But I just realized… it is better to use the PRNG, not pick your own. Pick your own is worse because people are crappy RNGs… the “birthday effect” alone highly biases 1…12 and 13…31, lucky numbers like 7 or 11, etc.

Speaking of which, 7 is the dominate lucky number in my culture (white, middle-aged, north North American male). And I think 11 is big in some Eastern Asian cultures.

Which leads me to wonder: what other lucky numbers are there? And why?

I think 7 is considered lucky as it’s the number of moving celestial objects visible to the naked eye: Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Saturn, Jupiter. There’s probably many other reasons…

/reply-to-self… I hope I don’t break nuthin’

1.3 billion…that’s about 650 million votes cast that say wealth isn’t earned or worked for, its awarded

Maybe Powerball should declare its personhood and run for President?

The Citizens, United, will never be defeated. :frowning:

2 Likes