No, this stuff.
Can’t get the cat back in the bottle after the chickens come home before you leap?
Ran into the issue yesterday, read up on it, saw this article, immediately came to mind:
It isn’t back. What the piece is actually about is a crippled mirror site, historical remnant, as it were.
I expect better from BB, but no one’s perfect. That said, an update would be nice, to say the least (sigh)
First time I’ve heard of the place. It really is sort of like coke mentioning pepsi in their ad’s. Gotta make sure we think there are two ‘sides’ in this, then demonize one and charge us to be policed.
Could some artists and makers get together, kick all the MBAs out of the room, and come to some consensus on how to proceed with IP/Copyright law?
Are you disappointed?
If you’re disappointed, you have to say that you are. It’s a rule.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.