Needs more banana.
Youâve been Zucked.
I like how they get to say âoh it was just some internal prank guyâ.
In all seriousness:
Google
FBI
[generic, general, âcast a wide netâ] spying
?
Whatâs the difference, these days?
Friends working in IT in Palo Alto tell me that Tha Feds have a dang office with locked doors inside Googleâs own dang office building.
Can we all just call it for what it is already?
All-one-all-one-ok-ok!
Iâm using âFBI Surveillance Wormâ on Slither.io.
From the article:
âIf I were Google, I would be seriously rankled over the use of their logo to hide surveillance,"
Right. Google prefers their surveillance right out in the open.
But mooooooooom!
They get to do warrantless surveillance - why canât I?!?
Does anyone know what trademark law has to say about this sort of activity?
I imagine that undercover cops are given a certain amount of latitude to adopt realistic disguises(at least in part because, if they do it correctly, almost nobody ever knows that it was actually a disguised cop rather than whatever the cop was disguised as); but if I were a company with a well-recognized brand, albeit one dogged by certain customer concerns regarding privacy, Iâd be inclined to feel that the use of my trademarked livery on state surveillance hardware poses a serious risk of trademark dilution, reputation damage, and various other tortious things, especially if it is repeated, ongoing, and gets discovered.
Do LEOs have some sort of trademark law immunity for this purpose? Could Google sue them into a smoking crater?
Thatâs arguably why Google might be especially rankled: theyâve had enough trouble with privacy concerns regarding street-view vehicles, and their services generally, so having undercover cops operating LPRs under the same brand name is very, very, unlikely to help.
Iâve seen those guys as well as the Google autonomous car around my neighborhood:
Gettinâ charged up at the grocery store!
Can LEO go undercover as UPS or FedEx? I would figure that would be the same thing.
However, I would think that an undercover operation would need other legal requirements or cooperation. They couldnât just drive around in a UPS truck giving out speeding tickets.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.