I can’t believe they got a sousaphone to have such good tone.
I hated playing sousaphone in high school. Our sousaphones were leaky, and it didn’t matter how much electrical tape you wrapped them in, or how tightly they always sounded like vuvuzelas and required about 3 times the airflow rate of a real tuba.
This is a fun song. I wouldn’t mind playing it.
My favorite thing in marching band was we figured out the Isengard leitmotif from Lord of the Rings. It’s in 5:4, and uses intervals not used very often, but it had a powerful effect when we scored a touchdown and this played:
Are our familiar Germanic number-names derivatives of P-Celtic number names borrowed into pre-Germanic?
It’s much easier to derive English four, five, and Gothic fidwor, fimf, from something like Welsh pedwar, pum, than Latin quattuor, quinque. Common Germanic usually transforms pre-Germanic p to f and pre-Germanic kw to hw (Grimm’s Law).
“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this
continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the
proposition that all men are created equal.”
Yeah, sure, but that’s entirely ceremonial speech. He could have said 87, but it wouldn’t have been so poetic. Whereas in french there is no “eighty” or anything like that. There’s “four twenties”, and they break the number systems saying crap like “sixty-thirteen” getting there.
Wouldn’t know for certain. Bit outta my pay-grade, if you know what I mean…
[quote=“MarjaE, post:63, topic:83867”]
It’s much easier to derive English four, five, and Gothic fidwor, fimf, from something like Welsh pedwar, pum, than Latin quattuor, quinque. Common Germanic usually transforms pre-Germanic p to f and pre-Germanic kw to hw (Grimm’s Law). [/quote]
But not enough. I’d forgotten that Italic is also divided between p-languages and q-languages. Apparently the q->p transformations are pretty common and completely unpredictable in Germanic, for example, Indo-European *wĺ̥kʷos yields wolf instead of the expected wolwh.
As a bass player, I always felt like my part was “play some oompahs, rest, more oompahs, long notes, shutup let the fancy cello do everything else”, even though I know you guys had it worse.
I liked Mendelssohn because he actually gave the bass something to do. That whole Romantic era was good for bass players.
The thought of playing a tuba in E major makes me cringe BTW. I’m going through the fingerings in my mind, and it does not feel natural at all. Brass players like flats and hate sharps. However, it’s been decades since I’ve played a brass instrument, so maybe that has something to do with it.
Also, yes I’m aware that the reason why I like flat key signatures is for no other reason than that’s what I was taught on and I never really had to play sharp signatures.