Eh. I think “most people” arguments are too dependent on waves of what’s fashionable as opposed to what’s identifiably essential to games.
Understandable, give their product line since 1899. They see themselves as a games company first. Technology not directly pertinent to that is simply not broadly relevant. And that’s a fine position to take, given the success they’ve enjoyed with every console but the Wii U.
Yeah, not all of us really want to troubleshoot our games (that’s not why I play games, anyway; if I want that “sense of competence,” I may as well just be at work). This is probably part of why Nintendo was able to ship over 100 million Wiis.
I still think this is a strange position. If you’re not a programmer, it’s not hard to find a GameCube or GC games. (Or a Wii, since, you know, it can run GC games.) So why bother messing with an emulator? If it’s the intellectual challenge, then Nintendo’s technological decisions are part of the whole package of difficulty. It means reaching for more than a mere screwdriver, but why wouldn’t you rejoice in this? Nintendo made you a really hard game to beat. Enjoy it.