That’s the issue with this whole thing; child porn is a horrific, real problem, and the asshole in question is making light of that problem by trying to make money off a flagrantly false claim. (Again, it speaks volumes that his parents have not been sued.)
Nudity ≠ pornography.
The image is of a naked baby swimming in a pool, alone. There’s nothing sexual about the content.
The only thing that is even remotely ‘suggestive’ about the image is the dollar bill on a fishing hook; which seems like more of a commentary on capitalism.
Agreed; everything about this drawn out story seems like an opportunistic money grab.
Again, no one would even know that guy had ever been the Never Mind baby if he hadn’t been bragging about it himself, for decades.
