AA?
Not really. It does not have a very good track record and has many elements of a cult. It works for a few but by and large it hasn’t been very effective at solving the drug problem.
AA?
Not really. It does not have a very good track record and has many elements of a cult. It works for a few but by and large it hasn’t been very effective at solving the drug problem.
(snicker)
Disprove it.
It’s hard to disprove, but it could just as easily be my wrong.
As could I be. Yet I refuse to accept being wrong based on someone just saying and showing no basis for their accusations. Have to come at it with more than that.
It was a statement on grammar actually. Bit of a joke you seem to have missed.
There is no grammatical error in saying “disprove it.”
Correct.
Sorry, I got it now. Missed my typo. Shit happens.
Indeed.
Yay Frisky Dingo!
As hilarious as the thread above is… according to the constitution, treaties carry the weight of constitutional law. Courts usually interpret them less strongly, but theoretically, every treaty has the weight of a constitutional amendment.
Wait. Do the secret treaties also count as Constitutional amendments? The secret trade treaties we negotiate in secret?
Before we got worse, back when we were good, when was that again? What year exactly?
Can congress ratify a treaty and it still be secret? But yeah, that’s the mechanism by which the new trade treaties are meant to make governments and democracy obsolete. Neoliberaliam and the end of history and all that. People could still kick off through strike actions, at least while jobs are still a thing we have.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.