I note there’s no comment on my accusation that you’re merely trying
to “Win” the argument. But there is a consistent implication that I’m
somehow representing “The Man’s” interests, which is simply not there
The no comment is due to your fallacious stance.
Post 1
I don’t have a huge issue pressuring heavy users So, with any ISP
right now, indeed, these policies are standard, and the way they are
generally enforced by even the most evil of ISP’s is actually not
really that draconian
.
Post 2
The clause in their TOS is backup if they need leverage against
egregious copyright infringers who suck up the most bandwidth. There
are literally doing what 100% of U.S. broadbrand providers are doing
for the exact same reasons
Post 3
This is the reality of competing in the broadband market
Post 4
Bottom line: Are 99.9% of customers going to be effected by the Google
“no servers” policy? No. Is the policy generally used by most ISP’s to
ensure quality of service for those users? Yes. Should the policy
exist? No. Is it generally harming consumers? Not really.
