The W3C is no longer a legitimate body of the internet, it should be disbanded and replaced by something less corrupt.
#STOP WASTING MIDORIÂ
Such as? Who will join this body? Do you think the people that actually work on operating systems and web browsers will do so?
Reddit users seem to be not so hot on this piece either:
Thatâs not my problem. Stay out of the W3C standards.
The W4C. Which everyone will listen to because theyâll be greater than the W3C.
Thatâs not my problem. Stay out of the W3C standards.
Stay out of the W3C standards.
Uhm, no. Whatâchoo going to do about it?
The idea that all the DRM-pushers will all have to use the same system does have its merits.
All the worldâs crackers can then concentrate on just one thing. One mistake or bad decision made anywhere in there, (or one person intentionally weakening it) and boom - everything becomes free to everyone everywhere and all the DRM-pushers lose.
I have noticed a trend of Cory blindly repeating EFF copy of late. I donât think heâs the problem exactly, but it does put the hurt on his tech cred.
I get that the EFF is saying the world is going to end with any new DRM, but, really, theyâve failed numerous times over the past ~20 years, and the world hasnât ended. In fact, itâs continued to get more awesome. I say this as a dude who in his 20âs ended up working for a non-DRM arm of a Big Bad DRM company and me and my coworkers were pretty cynical about it.
Hey man. Crazy idea. Maybe DRM isnât the end of the world, and (really crazy idea here) maybe it has its place, in the sense that it gives content producers the peace of mind to release digitally. For those who are cynical about this proposition, maybe try putting yourself in the shoes of popular youtubers. There is a plague of people lifting videos verbatim to make money (in fact, thereâs a huge industry of âcompilationâ videos of basically other peopleâs videos).
Or hell, try being a musician and trying to ensure that your music at minimum gets an attribution!
Yes, But! Teh Evil Empires! I hear you saying. Piracy is not the way to take down predatory record/media companies. But, it may have its role; society is still figuring it out. Many artists are seeing great success in direct-to-consumer sales. Fantastic. Maybe the future is DRM-free and pay-what-you-want? I doubt it, though. That works great for music when youâve got usually between 2 to 7 people involved in the financial pot. But film can easily involve thousands of people.
If thatâs what it takes for us to get movies on Netflix and Amazon, so be it. People want to pay for content, just make it easier than pirating. Stupid simple principle, and everyone can live with it as long as the target is casual pirates.
Donât get me wrong. The DMCA is the devil. The US copyright office is the devil. DRM is sometimes a pain in the ass (really, quite rarely).
I have noticed a trend of Cory blindly repeating EFF copy of late.
You realize heâs an EFF staffer brought back to focus on DRM issue and he wrote the pieces for them that heâs quoting?
The rest of your points stand well, though.
Well that explains the shrill hyperbole and lack of concrete facts.
ÂŻ\_(ă)_/ÂŻ
People want to pay for content, just make it easier than pirating. Stupid simple principle, and everyone can live with it as long as the target is casual pirates.
Really, it doesnât even need to be easier, just not so much more painful like it is. Anywhere in the same neighborhood would be a start.
- load the content up first instead of laggy buffering in the middle of the video, followed by dropping to low-res
- make pause/resume/bookmarking work consistently
- drop the anti-features like region-locking that prevent customers from watching what their friends are watching for no reason (relevant to the customer)
- provide all the content so customers donât need to search across 4 or more services to find the thing theyâre looking for (maybe work out referral deals?)
- keep the content, so things that customers had started watching donât mysteriously vanish before they finish (or when they want to re-watch)
- provide obscure content, not just the most-hyped pop-culture stuff
- ideally, let the customer use the media player of their choice instead of making them install a separate app for each service (presumably thatâs what this EME is trying to address)
Even with the awful app interfaces and annoyances like ads on hulu, a few simple things like that could go a long way.
It is? Really?
It is? Really?
Yep. Â
But he wants to stamp his feet until they listen!
It is? Really?