It got taken down. I appealed. They said it didn’t follow community standards. I appealed again with the following reasoning.
It’s not full frontal nudity. 2) It’s historical. Heck, it was published in a national magazine before most of us were even born. 3) If you’re concerned that it does contain full frontal nudity, take a closer look. That’s the folds of his skin and his body hair creating that optical illusion. 4) It’s newsworthy, since he recently died.
I got this response back.
We’re sorry we got this wrong. We reviewed your post again and it does follow our Community Standards.
We appreciate you taking the time to request a review. Your feedback helps us do better.
i once reported someone for advocating shooting trump protestors in the head. i even asked them if they meant figuratively, trying to deescalate their very public anger. they said no, they really meant it.
facebook did not care. they said none of it violated their standards.
that company and its employees are helping to shape this very $@#! timeline we all live in