Derivative pics indeed.
I’m liking porn-adjacent.
Remember kids, it doesn’t need to be NSFW to look NSFW. Ask yourself … “What would Judy in accounting think of thisif she glanced over while walking by?”
True story: the last thing I saw on BB one night at the hotel was the post about the woman claiming one hoagie looked like her virgin daughter’s vulva and another hoagie looked like what she imagined the slut Taylor Swift’s vulva must look like. Side by side hoagies. I must have closed my laptop without shutting the browser. When I opened it up at work – with a couple people chatting right behind me … first thing I see are two hoagie shots and the BB title including the words
TAYLOR SWIFT’S VAGINA
I shut that down faster than the speed of light. Nobody ever said anything, so I am still trying to just forget that happened.
So, no one came up to you later and was like, “I see we have similar interests in common…”
I’m Thinking Arby’s™
Now, combine this with Deep Dream for some Cronenberg meets spirit-animal inspired nightmares (or fantasies, if that’s your thing).
this will become a new fetish. if it’s not already.
OK. The Greek origin of the first part of the word pornography is either porneia - sexual desire - or he porni, a prostitute. It can be translated, therefore, either as “pictures of or writing about sex”, or “pictures of prostitutes”.
The Greek word for “sexual” is actually “sexualikos”, so perhaps the original quote of @Papasan should have been “things that are not porneia, but look sexual.”
How does it feel being an overbearing smartass? I expect I’ll regret it in the morning.
This is why it helps to get to know your fellow workers, because perhaps Judy in accounting is moonlighting in something else entirely and has seen things you wouldn’t believe, while the person you need to watch out for is Darren in facilities who is a Christian Dominionist.
[just rejecting the probably unintended narrative that it’s the women who are easily shocked, not the men.]
I’m getting confused feelings from these images
Probably half subliminal (in an unnoticeable way) and half because it was a woman from accounting who was behind me at the moment.
It’s fun to take this approach with landscape photography.
With our filthy human minds it’s not that hard to find rude images in rocks and trees using nothing more than careful dreaming and a dirty imagination
Some of these look like Georgia O’Keefe paintings.
Better than the ham-cheese pita.
Recently I was talking to someone in my IT staff when I brought out a little spooky noise-box art project I bought online, not thinking I brought out the pamphlet that described the artists works installed within, and one of the more kvlt sound designers had used a picture suggesting grainily that a woman had severed the penis of a corpse.
Welp, that could have ended poorly, but I wouldn’t have discussed sound art if the person wasn’t already in the arts. I still felt pretty dumb.
But hey, vagenda of manocide is in these days!
That lamaranagram is goofing off reading BB at work instead of working?
Nope, there’s a whole lotta range of pictures with imaginary dicks out in the world. Looks like they invented a pareidolia algorythm.
What I take from this article is that the algorithm author stumbled over a digital version of Pareidolia which begs the question of selecting for enhancing said likeness for art purposes or using images flagged as pareidolia to refine anti-porn filters.
With that being said, I bet Chuck Tingle is writing “Pounded in the Butt by my almost-porny Scenic Images”
The “uncanny valley” takes on a whole new meaning.