Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2019/09/26/nasa-releases-new-visualizatio.html
…
I stared at the animation over coffee this morning.
Late to work today.
With the time dilation, is it “objects in the mirror may be younger then they appear”? Older?
Just watch Interstellar.
The math artists of Interstellar:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/32/6/065001
Gravitational lensing by spinning black holes in astrophysics, and in the movie Interstellar
Oliver James, Eugénie von Tunzelmann, Paul Franklin and Kip S Thorne
Look up that last name if it is not familiar.
Thanks, now I have a new desktop background!
NASA’S been tweeting images and articles for Black Hole Week, and I’m loving it. I’ve been fascinated by black holes (and astronomy in general) since I was a little kid.
I can’t figure out who said it first, but, while black holes can eat, they can’t hunt. As I understand it, it would be extremely difficult to actually get yourself into a black hole. Although maybe your concern is simply the intense radiation coming from the accretion disk?
For some reason this came to mind.
Or the tides stretching you into a spaghetti noodle.
Interstellar employed Kip Thorne, one of the foremost authorities on black holes, as a scientific consultant.
More fake news, according to conservatives (Andrew Schlafly):
https://www.conservapedia.com/Black_hole
OMG, this line, WTF…
Black holes are conceptually associated with “wormholes”,[4] which never caught on with the public, perhaps due to its unattractive terminology.
The “pop culture” section of the entry DOESN’T EVEN MENTION DEEP SPACE NINE, WHAT ASSHOLES.
That is a fascinating website…
In that it’s made by a bunch of conservatives who think that wikipedia has a liberal bias… but it’s also kind of scary, because people will read shit like that and believe it.
FTA: with heavy reliance on theoretical equations.
Ah, there’s the good old right-wingnut distrust of math.
Ignorance I can abide; it’s the condition everyone begins with on anything. Willful ignorance is just contemptible.
“Trustworthy”, like “moral” when self-applied, tells you everything you need to know.
How … how does astrophysics have a “liberal bias”?