Wikipedia: Deleted articles with freaky titles


#1

[Permalink]


#2

They took out my favorite Wikipedia article!


#3

And that’s actually a real phenomenon! But maybe it really didn’t need a whole article to itself.


#4

Article? I bought the book!


#5

What, are they running out of 0s and 1s? Not enough room in the tubes for it?


#6

Having perused that list, I’m not sure I want a Wikipedia without these articles.


#7

I’m stunned Wingsuit Combat isn’t in there.


#8

OK, now I’m dying to know what Partial Unbirthing Fetishism is.


#9

If you just think through each word logically, you can probably work it out. Much safer than googling.


#10

which was way better then the movie!


#11

they should start a second site called wtf-ipedia and move the articles there.


#12

Wackipedia!


#13

i was actually going to suggest that first, but then realized that any repository with that name might as well be called spankbank. that would be an entirely different venture.


#14

Just the other day I was discussing Cambodian scrotum thieves with a friend, and a point of contention came up. We were unable to resolve the issue. That Wikipedia let us down is bad enough. We couldn’t even get help from the library.

I guess they expect kids to learn about Cambodian scrotum thieves on the street.


#15

I was into them before they sold out.


#16

Don’t worry - I hear they’ll have more by the end of the week!


#17

No, but arguably that’d work better organizationally as a subsection of the Mallard Duck article rather than an article all on its own.


#18

“Read More Link-Induced Rage”


#19

These sound like articles that belong on everything2 instead of uptight Wikipedia.


#20

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/

It’s Wikipedia, if it were created in the fiery depths of hell.