man, thats ugly, like a simulated cheapo-ad for some tourist-traps in paris. who greenlit this?
The script for the short wasnât created using AI, apparently, but instead was written by TCLâs Chief Content Officer and Chief Creative Officer.
oh, okayâŚ
Jesus Christ why would they include so many shots with closeups of fucked-up hands? Did they think we wouldnât believe it was really AI-generated otherwise?
What I donât get is supposedly they had real animators work on this too. Why wouldnât you have them fix all the weird issues? Theyâre either really cheap or trying to tank this, possibly both depending on who made what decision.
One of the things with AI video is that it isnât built using rigged models you can easily manipulate like traditional CGI, just like AI art doesnât have preliminary sketches to go back to. There arenât really the kind of âsource filesâ a real human artist would be able to go back to if they want to make a fix.
just because they said so doesnt mean its true.
They might sound smarter if so many of 'em werenât rwnjs.
At this point the best option for the majority of the people posting on the micro-blogging site former known as âTwitterâ to âsound smartâ is to SHUT UP.
And Grok wonât change that.
Because itâs beyond the intellectual capacity of premium users to cut and paste from another AI service.
the mainstream takes notice;
are we caught in an AI bubble? Is the pope a Catholic?
crosslink:
Or that it finally dawns on us that AI technology is an environmental disaster in the making; the planet cannot be paved with datacentres.
I love BLAME!.
I kinda think thatâs what Nick Land wants⌠Planet paved with datacentres.
Or something like this:
As events progress in Accelerando, the planets of the Solar System are dismantled over time to form a Matrioshka brain, a vast solar-powered computational device inhabited by minds inconceivably more advanced and complex than naturally evolved intelligences such as human beings.
