Mixing it up with Pokémon surely?
1 Like
To be abundantly clear, as it stands, OpenAI currently spends $2.35 to make $1.
OpenAI loses money every single time that somebody uses their product, and while it might make money selling premium subscriptions, I severely doubt it’s turning a profit on these customers, and certainly losing money on any and all power users. As I’ve said before, I believe there’s also a subprime AI crisis brewing because OpenAI’s API services — which lets people integrate its various models into external products — is currently priced at a loss, and increasing prices will likely make this product unsustainable for many businesses currently relying on these discounted rates.
As I’ve said before, OpenAI is unprofitable, unsustainable and untenable in its current form, but I think it’s important to explain exactly how untenable it is
10 Likes
2 Likes
2 Likes
“This isn’t going to stop,” Allen told the New York Times. “Art is dead, dude. It’s over. A.I. won. Humans lost.”
so what tf is your problem then, mate? if its the “ai” which “made” “your” piece, by your statement, shouldnt get midjourney then the right to copyrighted it?
1 Like
5 Likes
3 Likes
New winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics.
3 Likes
2 Likes
…skin
4 Likes
9 Likes
We’ve gotten to the point where AI promoters don’t even know what an equation is, huh? Although E = mc2 + AI is actually true if AI = 0.
14 Likes
3 Likes
4 Likes
LinkedIn has taken its denial of responsibility a step further: it will hold users responsible for sharing any policy-violating misinformation created by its own AI tools
come again? what?!?
3 Likes
4 Likes
5 Likes
Politicians lap that shit up.
It’s bollox.
3 Likes
It’s actually A*I, currently I is a very small number approaching zero but researchers are working on increasing A. Currently I is decreasing faster than A is increasing, but not for long.
4 Likes
