#1 By: Mark Frauenfelder, September 7th, 2013 11:03
#2 By: Tyler Karaszewski, September 7th, 2013 11:56
Wait, there are APIs for cars now? Is this a Ford-only thing? If so, I might have just decided what my next car is going to be. Do I have to jailbreak my car, or can I just go buy a Ford Explorer off the lot, plug in, and start hacking?
#3 By: John Ridley, September 7th, 2013 12:13
It's a great idea, but won't mean much until it includes depreciation and expected servicing. Manufacturers probably wouldn't like it because it would be an eye-opener to get in your car on Monday morning after a week away on vacation and see that the car cost you $100 to sit in the driveway.
#4 By: pesco, September 7th, 2013 13:08
Yes, API for your car! It's called Ford OpenXC, which is an open source hardware/platform for doing interesting stuff with the data from your car! Check out here for more:
At the Boing Boing: Ingenuity hack day, several dozen of our favorite hackers, designers, and developers will have the opportunity to work with Open XC, Ford's open-source platform that connects smart phones and tablets to real-time vehicle data.
Our partner Ford created a terrific video highlighting the fun we had at Boing Boing Ingenuity: Data Driven, our first ever hack day that took place on August 17!
#5 By: Jonathan Roberts, September 7th, 2013 13:21
It should also shoot up a few hundred dollars if you hit a particularly nasty pothole and wreck your suspension.
#6 By: retepslluerb, September 7th, 2013 13:28
Ah well, my car has a pedometer, so I'm good.
#7 By: Jeffrey Fisher, September 7th, 2013 17:40
" It could eventually incorporate fuel cost, wear-and-tear, servicing, depreciation, etc. "
So its incorporating... uh. Like nothing right now?
#8 By: James Riley, September 7th, 2013 18:00
My satnav already estimates my fuel economy, knows how far I've gone on a trip, and I tell it how much fuel costs these days. I can enter my own fuel use readings so it works better.
#9 By: technogeek, September 7th, 2013 18:30
Note that there are cost-of-driving meters available off the shelf. My GPS supports an optional OBDII interface which -- depending on how much info a particular car makes available -- can be as accurate a realtime/historical efficiency meter as the "Prius Game".
I like the idea of making more data available more reliably and more easily, but let's keep it in context: Interesting evolution, not revolution.
#10 By: greggman, September 8th, 2013 05:57
Let's see. My car cost $40k out the door. I paid $10k in interest before I paid it off. I had it 6 years. I paid $1500 a year in car ins. I extended my service contract once for $4k. I put 2 sets of tires on it for $1200. So,
There's 100k miles on it. It gets ~400 miles to the tank. If the average price to fill it is $50 over the last 6 years that's
100k/400*50 = $12.5k
If I sold it today it could supposedly get at least $12k for it so
($65.4k+$12.5k-$12k) / 100k miles = $0.66 per mile.
That means my commute when I worked 40 miles away was costing me $53 a day round trip
Didn't really need an app for that though yea, it would be neat to see the money ticking away. Given that the longer you keep the car the more it's initial cost is spread out if the app showed cost per mile would show the more I drive the better it gets.
Continued... I figured I could probably add in $250 a month for the garage (12*6*250 = $18k) + and various parking charges which I'm just going to take a wild guess is about $50 a month (12*6*50= $3.6k) so
($65.4k+$12.5k-$12k+$18k+$3.6) / 100k miles = $0.88 per mile
Which brings that commute = $70 a day
What else am I forgetting?
$70 a day is ~$1400 a month for commuting 40 miles. I guess that gives you some idea of how big a perk those shuttles from Google, Apple, Genetech, etc are worth at a minimum.
#11 By: technogeek, September 8th, 2013 13:58
What the app gives you is immediate feedback on your driving style -- knowing which speeds are most efficient for your particular car, reminder that jackrabbit starts and late braking do cost you money, that sort of thing. It's unclear how much this sort of realtime information actually helps (versus how distracting it might be), but some of us like the idea of having it available -- it certainly makes more sense than the tachometer on the dashboard of my automatic-transmission vehicle.
#12 By: Jeff Atwood, September 8th, 2013 15:21
Great list of auto ownership costs. Are you forgetting the cost of car insurance? I don't see that listed in your calculations and it is mandatory.
I'd add that once you have children, it is basically impossible not to have a vehicle though. So even if you had a fancy Google shuttle, you'd need the car around. Cost per mile might actually go up, even though you drive less.
#13 By: David Harris, September 9th, 2013 11:58
Hey, this is David, one of the hackers on this project. We were interviewed for this early in the morning before we had built in all the costs but by the time we were done, we had it set up to include depreciation, wear and tear/repairs, parking, insurance plus the real time cost of fuel.
#14 By: greggman, September 11th, 2013 09:05
It's there. I listed it as $1500 a year times 6 years.
#15 By: technogeek, September 11th, 2013 09:42
A simple spreadsheet makes tracking real cost of owning/operating the car easy, if you enter everything relevant.
But, as noted, that's different from having (a) realtime info or (b) info correlated with exactly how, when, and (if you want to include GPS in the mix) where the car is being driven.
#16 By: retepslluerb, September 11th, 2013 13:48
Perhaps in America.
#17 By: technogeek, September 11th, 2013 14:36
"In the UK, people think 100 years is a short time. In the US, people think 100 miles is a short distance."
Not that much of an exaggeration.
#18 By: retepslluerb, September 11th, 2013 14:57
People regulary drive their kids 100 miles? Who would'a thunk?
No, seriously, there are of course lots of areas where not having a car is a major inconvenience and perhaps in some places it's an impossibility.
But when a majority of urban Americans simply can't do without a car (as opposed to it being a convenience), it's because they want to have it that way, not because it is some natural law.
#19 By: technogeek, September 11th, 2013 15:04
You took a bit of a jump there from codinghorror's comment. Not all Americans are urban, or even suburban.
I wholeheartedly agree that kids can probably transport themselves a lot more and further than we usually let them. And that many kids' lives are overplanned and overprotected.
But a blanket challenge to everyone who says the car was necessary is sorta begging to be shot down. There are too many good counterexamples.
#20 By: retepslluerb, September 12th, 2013 03:56
No, but the urbanization rate is comparable to Western Europe.
next page →