maggiekb at January 9th, 2014 17:02 — #1
fluffitfluffit at January 9th, 2014 20:58 — #2
there's an old road from the 1800s running through our neighborhood. the only way you know it's there is a slight depression in the forest.
this is why archeologists have to dig up old cities. they don't just sit there in the sun. nature takes over.
some_guy at January 9th, 2014 21:13 — #3
If you go hiking in the "100 mile wilderness"-- the last 100 miles of the Appalachian Trail in Maine, where there are no paved roads for 100 miles (though several gravel logging roads) you will notice that you will be walking all day through (apparently) pristine forest, no signs of humanity but the trail, and then suddenly there's a classic New England stone wall (with trees of 50 years or more growing out of parts of it) in the middle of nowhere.
snig at January 9th, 2014 22:19 — #4
I've seen low stone walls "in the middle of the woods" in upstate New York and Pennsylvania too.
knappa at January 9th, 2014 22:27 — #5
Yeah, my grandparents has a wall and an old stone foundation in their woods in northwest PA. There was one side of the foundation which was on ground level and the deer would often nest there. It seemed deep, deep in the woods when I was young.
prestonsturges at January 10th, 2014 00:36 — #6
The other thing to look for is a patch of daffodils in the spring, or a lone apple tree. The daffodils seem to persist and spread for decades. Some of those old heirloom apples are long sought by apple conservationists. Maybe there will be a one stone that was the doorstep. Sometimes there will be a spring coming up from under a stone block. Some of those stone walls may not have ever had a real purpose except to provide a place to put all those damn rocks.
But it's still quite a stretch to mistake this third or fourth growth forest for the original virgin forest. The old growth forests were like dim cathedrals.,
kennykb at January 10th, 2014 08:26 — #7
I quite agree that first- and second-growth forests are easy to distinguish in the Eastern mixed forest. Arguably, in my part of the world (northeastern New York), there is no "old growth", since all the ecosystems were severely disrupted in the last ice age. The soil takes longer to rebuild than that.
It's hard to tell old-growth from second-growth in pitch-pine "fire climax" regions. There, the entire forest burns and rebuilds itself every few decades, owing to the inflammability of the pines. Arson is part of their lifestyle. Their cones do not release seeds unless they are burnt: they are the most inflammable of all the trees, and once a generation they burn down the forest to clear away the competition for their offspring.
The subalpine krummholz is nearly all old-growth, since there was never anything economically viable to harvest there. The signs of human visitation persist for centuries, though, because the soil and vegetation are so fragile. But you can often see a fir tree, no more than thirty feet tall and having only a few live branches, that is nevertheless centuries old.
I have the good fortune to have visited patches of woodland left that are fairly undisturbed: never logged, never farmed, not even extensively hunted, by virtue of inaccessibility. There's nothing like hiking in a stand of 300-year-old hemlocks.
I've also had the experience of coming upon a ghost town in the woods that I know nothing about. All that is left are stone foundations, walls, hearths and tumbled chimneys. There were a cluster of houses, some tanning vats, and a mill or two. I've asked some knowledgeable locals, and nobody seems to know anything about who lived there or what they called their settlement. One of these months, I'm going to have to get into the county historical society and see if they know anything. The register of deeds will be hopeless. If you don't know the plat number, you won't be able to find anything, and the property in question has been state forest since the 1880s..
In places like Harriman State Park in New York or Mount Washington State Forest in Massachusetts, you can even find extensive evidence of heavy industry. Those places had been hellholes in the nineteenth century: the land so degraded that it was merely an ocean of mud, all the trees burnt for charcoal or peeled for tanning, iron furnaces belching smoke that hung as a pall over the entire area, abandoned buildings falling to ruin. Now they're quite pleasant again, but the hiker must be careful not to fall into an abandoned mineshaft, implale a body part on a rusted metal implement, or start a rock slide in a defunct quarry. If you know what to look for, there are signs of habitation and industry everywhere!
prestonsturges at January 10th, 2014 12:25 — #8
Compare that the England where some of the hedges are 600 years old. A hedge is mentioned in the account of something like the Battle of Hastings, and that hedge is still there.
prestonsturges at January 10th, 2014 12:29 — #9
The other thing that was quite common were local narrow gauge railroads and tramways, often following local waterways. probably a lot of them were associated with mines or lumber mills. Often there is no trace except a bit of a grade cut where there was an old timber bridge. In some places, the old stone bridges are still standing . If I were rich, I'd have one moved to my vast estate.
Likewise, there are sometimes old brick railroad tunnels. we used to go down a long tunnel to a strip mine to party. Now that hill has been graded and houses built. The 300 yard tunnel is probably under that neighborhood now, 50' down. Other tunnels are barricaded or partly filled in. I know of one just out of sight from a busy highway that is half full of water and supported by timbers - an obvious death trap.
fuzzyfungus at January 10th, 2014 12:39 — #10
Even newer than the ice age, the Age of Sail really helped cut down on the distinction between 'pretty damn old growth' and 'relatively new regrowth'.
The bill of materials for a good size wooden ship (especially one designed to actually survive substantial cannon fire) involves heroic amounts of massive, solid(none of your 'manufactured wood' particleboard or plywood crap), cuts of various hardwood, especially oak.
I'm actually not sure that some of the classic 'wooden ships and iron men' era designs could even be executed today. Sure, we can deliver enough steel to lay the keel of an aircraft carrier by the end of the quarter; but a Man 'o War might be a modest sized forest of centuries-old high quality hardwood.
deedub at January 10th, 2014 12:55 — #11
National Seashore in Wisconsin
prestonsturges at January 10th, 2014 14:37 — #12
Dolly Sods WV is a wilderness area is a mountaintop that was logged and then burned literally to the bedrock. Many traces of the old lumber railroads crisscross the hillsides. Now it's a landscape of craggy bedrock and stunted tree and famous for its wildflowers. ironically, it is often featured in Sierra Club calenders.
The extensive high areas in Dolly Sods and Flatrock-Roaring Plains were once mostly covered by dense, ancient red spruce and eastern hemlock forest. The trees were 60 to 90 feet (27 m) tall (18–27 m) and some measured at least 12 feet (370 cm) in diameter. The greatest stand of red spruce in the world, in terms of size and quality, could be found along the upper Red Creek. The largest recorded tree ever cut in West Virginia was a white oak, harvested in this region. Nearly as large as a Giant Sequoia, it was probably well over 1,000 years old and measured 13 feet (4 m) in diameter at a height of 16 feet (5 m), and 10 feet (3 m) in diameter 31 feet (9.4 m) above the base. We will probably never know how large the biggest trees in West Virginia were because most cuttings were not documented. Centuries of accumulated needles from these trees created a blanket of humus (soil) seven to nine feet deep.....> .Unfortunately, however, the humus covering the ground dried up when the protective tree cover was removed. Sparks from the locomotives, saw mills and logger's warming fires easily ignited this humus layer and the extensive slash — wood too small to be marketable, such as branches and tree crowns — left behind by loggers. Fires repeatedly ravaged the area in the 1910s, scorching everything right down to the underlying rocks. All insects, worms, salamanders, mice and other burrowing forms of life perished and the area became a desert.
blindwanderer at January 11th, 2014 20:16 — #13
Sure we may now have forests but they are not old growth forests, no really big trees. Also because of our animal management programs (no wolves) deer populations have exploded which leads the deer to eat ALL saplings of specific species of indigenous trees. So not only are the forests younger, they are made up of different types of trees.
prestonsturges at January 11th, 2014 23:57 — #14
Well, all by itself, chestnut blight dramatically changed to composition of new growth.
maggiekb at January 14th, 2014 17:02 — #15
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.