What Iāve never understood about the āUN Immunity Conventionā claims is that, while there is such an instrument, and it does provide for immunity on par with that of diplomats, it also places several requirements on the UN:
Section 21 of the document āThe United Nations shall co-operate at all times with the appropriate authorities of Members to facilitate the proper administration of justice, secure the observance of police regulations and prevent any abuse in connection with the privileges, immunities, and facilities mentioned in this Article.ā
Perhaps more importantly, Article 7, sections 29 and 30:
āThe United Nations shall make provisions for appropriate modes of settlement of:
(a) disputes arising out of contracts or other disputes of a private law character to which the United Nations is a party;
(b) disputes involving any official of the United Nations who by reason of his official position enjoys immunity, if immunity has not been waived by the Scretary-General.ā
āAll differences arising out of the interpretation or application of the present convention shall be referred to the International Court of Justice, unless in any case it is agreed by the parties to have recourse to another mode of settlement. If a difference arises between the United Nations on the one hand and a Member on the other hand, a request shall be made for an advisory opinion on any legal question involved in accordance with Article 96 of the Charter and Article 65 of the Statute of the Court. The opinion given by the Court shall be accepted as decisive by the parties.ā
Even the UNās own pet commentary on the Convention includes the note:
"The de facto āabsoluteā immunity of the United Nations is mitigated by the fact that article VIII, section 29, of the Convention requires the United Nations to āmake provisions for appropriate modes of settlement of: (a) disputes arising out of contracts or other disputes of a private law character to which the United Nations is a partyā. The General Conventionās obligation to provide for alternative dispute settlement in case of the Organizationās immunity from legal process can be regarded as an acknowledgment of the right of access to court as contained in all major human rights instruments.
Private law contracts entered into by the United Nations regularly contain arbitration clauses. In the case of tort claims, such as those resulting from harm suffered as a result of peacekeeping operations or vehicular accidents, the United Nations usually agrees on similar forms of dispute resolution. Staff disputes within the United Nations are settled by an internal mechanism in the form of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, established in 1949 (General Assembly resolution 351 A (IV) of 9 December 1949). In 2009, this system will undergo a major reform leading to the establishment of a two-tier judicial system with a United Nations Dispute Tribunal and a United Nations Appeals Tribunal."
That certainly isnāt your standard private actor; but it isnāt impunity, especially when the UNās āprovisions for appropriate modes of settlementā currently appear to be 'Haha, fuck you, canāt touch us. Now, why arenāt you showing the proper gratitude for our limited ameliorative efforts in the face of the epidemic we created, you filthy savages?".
Maybe the Haitians can sue the barely-wealthier country the Cholera-ridden UN soldiers came from.
Our Wolfram Alpha overlords say that Nepal has a higher GDP; but actually a slightly lower GDP per capita(though slightly higher if you look at GDP PPP).
Probably not the guys worth suing.
I was being sarcastic. Of course the U.N. should pony up.
But more importantly, they should set some minimum standards for camp hygiene and vaccinations and health checkups for its peacekeepers / disaster workers.
You have to wonder if they are more competent at public health and basic epidemiology when dealing with the locals, and are blinded by a āwe are clean; because we are here to save the benightedā complex, or whether they just have competence issues all aroundā¦ Itās not as though āpublic healthā and āsanitationā are out-of-scope for anybody planning on doing a bit of humanitarian aid work.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
