pesco at December 4th, 2013 13:41 — #1
jandrese at December 4th, 2013 13:51 — #2
I wouldn't be surprised if it fell behind a desk or a piece of machinery and was only discovered when someone renovated the postal facility or finally replaced that 70 year old clunker of a machine.
lightningwaltz at December 4th, 2013 13:58 — #3
One thing is for sure, the SFGate article is not going too help with useful information. Lots of words, no explanation from relevant sources at the post office or anywhere else.
noahdjango at December 4th, 2013 14:02 — #4
It's because San Francisco is a magnet for nutty freethinkers who think they can subvert the mail all willy-nilly. The stamps were probably dosed with hallucinogenic drugs.
incarnedine_v at December 4th, 2013 14:08 — #5
You know what this means?
He's alive! The Doc's alive! He's in the wild west, but he's alive!
spunkytws at December 4th, 2013 14:14 — #6
Years ago I worked in a mailroom. One September afternoon we found a couple of plastic mail bins in the grass next to the building. They were full of applications for a nearby university--applications that had been mailed the previous year.
I still don't understand why, if he wasn't going to deliver them, the mail carrier didn't just dump them in the trash somewhere. He liked to sit in the Burger King parking lot and drink beer for a couple of hours every afternoon. He could have disposed of them a few at a time.
silkox1 at December 4th, 2013 14:17 — #7
That Air Force base is now called Joint Base Lewis-McCord, and it's entirely likely that the holdup was at the base, not with the USPS.
samsam at December 4th, 2013 15:14 — #8
That, and the fact that the yellow stickers were not in use until well after 1945, convince him that the mystery letter has been tucked away somewhere for almost 70 years.
Yes, that and the fact that the yellow sticker is dated "11/15/13"...
fireshadow at December 4th, 2013 17:04 — #9
Why is 30% of that article about the sender's love life?
technogeekagain at December 4th, 2013 17:09 — #10
Would you rather that they simply discarded rediscovered old mail, rather than trying to deliver it (and returning it if undeliverable)?
This is a case of a fail-safe system failing safe. Let's celebrate that, rather than complaining about it!
daneel at December 4th, 2013 17:12 — #11
Have you read How Henry J. Littlefinger Licked the Hippies' Scheme to Take Over the Country by Tossing Pot in Postage Stamp Glue by John Keefauver?
imb at December 4th, 2013 17:32 — #12
I used to have a carrier who would deliver (dump) everyone's mail to my box on Monday. I would give the mail to other people, then realized I wasn't being paid as a part time sorter, so I stopped and left them in the box for the next carrier to pick up. I think your boozy mailman might have forgotten where he left the box. Or, you know, maybe he thought you'd deliver them.
noahdjango at December 4th, 2013 18:02 — #13
No. I thought you were making a joke until I googled it. can't find an electronic copy, though. Keefauver doesn't even have a Wiki page.
simonize at December 4th, 2013 18:32 — #14
At least they didn't return it postage due...I'm surprised that it wasn't stamped "Found in supposedly empty postal equipment" I've gotten months old mail like that.
spunkytws at December 5th, 2013 08:45 — #15
He did have a habit of expecting non-postal employees to deliver mail for him. Sometimes when we tried to give him back misdelivered mail he'd say, "I don't want it." He also had a habit of not delivering the mail at all. When that happened the local post office would tell us "he didn't feel like it".
The sad thing is those were applications for the university's nursing school, and by the time we found them the school year had started. I hope the applicants realized that they hadn't really been rejected because no one had seen their applications.
imb at December 5th, 2013 10:39 — #16
It sounds like you had my old carrier, or his clone. It's really funny when written on paper, but so much in reality. Thanks for the laugh. I have no delivery complaints lately, thankfully.
raybert at December 5th, 2013 13:44 — #17
Wait, what? Any links to anything on that?
noahdjango at December 5th, 2013 14:07 — #18
yeah, I was kinda hoping @daneel would step up here, but I don't think there's anything other than links to buy the physical short fiction compilation in which it was published:
raybert at December 5th, 2013 14:14 — #19
All I found so far is this
I knew the name from the hearings on organized crime but little else.
daneel at December 5th, 2013 14:18 — #20
Afraid that's all I have. I remember reading it 20 odd years ago in my parents' copy of that collection.
I don't recall much beyond the title I think Roald Dahl's Royal Jelly is in there too.
Edit: I checked the contents, that Dahl story is in there. An Asimov, too...
I remember the one by Richard Matheson - The Distrbutor. That one was creepy.
next page →