maggiekb at December 25th, 2013 13:43 — #1
timquinn at December 25th, 2013 13:51 — #2
The hot water washes the soap off faster and more thoroughly (and feels good on old and tired hands.)
diana at December 25th, 2013 14:09 — #3
The biggest problem with handwashing is that people don't do it, or don't do it properly. It won't improve compliance now that facility managers have an excuse to turn-off the expensive water heaters.
samwinston at December 25th, 2013 14:47 — #4
If the water is cold, the washing is mostly symbolic. If it's hot or warm I wash much longer and more thoroughly.
actionabe at December 25th, 2013 14:52 — #5
When I worked food service at a hospital, hand-washing with hot water was mandatory as a matter of policy. I will say that in the dead of winter, after having just come in to start a shift, hand-washing with hot water was definitely mandatory as purely practical matter. (And we still had a hard time making sure people washed their hands every time they were supposed to, the way they're supposed to.)
I think it will take a long time for the policy manuals and administrative rules to catch up with the science though.
chuckv at December 25th, 2013 15:00 — #6
seekup at December 25th, 2013 15:32 — #7
I tend to think the entire point of using hot water was never to kill bacteria, but rather because hot water is a better solvent than cold.
johngomm at December 25th, 2013 15:33 — #8
"Although the perception that hot water is more hygienic is based in some factual evidence..."
Erm, so I'm confused: they have seen research saying that it IS actually better, from an evidence-based hygiene perspective, contrary to the headline. May not be better energy-wise, but that's not the claim. Poor writing Smithsonian. The CDC does concur that temperature is not a helpful factor http://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/show-me-the-science-handwashing.html and have references for the research, but the original papers are not freely available, it seems, so I can't see the methodology. Once again we are left wondering why original research is not freely and easily available to the public.
actionabe at December 25th, 2013 16:00 — #9
Review the subject of the sentence, and it makes perfect sense.
mthead at December 25th, 2013 16:03 — #10
Who the heck thought they were killing bacteria by handwashing, anyway? (Answer: all those people who've gone gaga over anti-bacterial this'n'that. Ah well.)
The point of handwashing has always been to wash off the bacteria, not to kill them and leave the corpses in place. And hot water is observably better at cleaning stuff off your hands than cold. (Try this: change your oil / change a tire / whatever gets your hands greasy and grimy. Wash your hands with soap and cold water. Then do it all again with soap and hot water. The results speak for themselves.)
martin_beldin at December 25th, 2013 16:52 — #11
Warm water is good, since you'll wash more thoroughly. Hot water is bad, since it will dry your hands out more. Which is important when there you have to wash your hands often.
kymbakhan at December 25th, 2013 16:53 — #12
I thought the warm water was to help the soap penetrate fats/oils just a little quicker/easier so you don't have to wash for so long to get good effect?
timquinn at December 25th, 2013 18:19 — #13
There is more to washing one's hands than killing or removing bacteria. What about other dirt? We have here a case of being misled by what is not being said.
squidgyb at December 25th, 2013 18:41 — #14
Those are exactly my thoughts - everything dissolves better in warm/hot water, so logically washing in hot water will more thoroughly and effectively clean an object, whether hands, body, clothes, car, floor, cutlery, carpet or dishes. As well as the aforementioned glory of warm water on cold hands.
macadamia_nuts at December 25th, 2013 19:03 — #15
I anyone helps me pirate this http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15824636 that would be much appreciated.
anthonyc at December 26th, 2013 08:57 — #16
Since handwashing temperatures are well within the range used to proof yeast and culture bacteria, this lack of bacteria killing is unsurprising to me, but I would be surprised if hot water being a better solvent didn't matter.
msbpodcast1 at December 26th, 2013 11:08 — #17
Hot water washes off sugar and denatured proteins faster than cold water. I'll keep on using hot water, if you don't mind...
msbpodcast1 at December 26th, 2013 11:11 — #18
Redd Foxx would be proud of me. I got a Toto Washlet.
cleveremi at December 26th, 2013 11:37 — #19
You know how they say that the best exercise routine is whatever you actually do? Regardless of any study, I'm going to continue to wash my hands with comfortably warm water and old-fashioned soap. If the water is too cold or too hot, I'm less likely to wash my hands, and I refuse to buy anti-bacterial or foo-foo fancy scented soap. I'll stick to Ivory or the generic equivalent, thanks.
jerwin at December 26th, 2013 11:53 — #20
Damn environmentalists. It's the depths of winter. I'm not going to start washing my hands in (ice) cold water. Doing so might put me off frequent hand washing.
next page →