maggiekb at March 26th, 2014 11:10 — #1
stryxvaria at March 26th, 2014 12:01 — #2
The Seattle Times currently has a good article about the slide area with some useful graphics, especially the swipeable map showing the before and after.
avisolo at March 26th, 2014 12:48 — #3
The Terrible Fruits of Indiscriminate Logging:(
nixiebunny at March 26th, 2014 12:58 — #4
Unfortunately, a long history of disasters doesn't seem to factor into some peoples' decision that a certain place is a good place to live. There's a certain myopia inherent to humans regarding such risk.
zaren at March 26th, 2014 13:16 — #5
When I first came here, this was all swamp. Everyone said I was daft to build a castle on a swamp, but I built in all the same, just to show them. It sank into the swamp. So I built a second one. That sank into the swamp. So I built a third. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp. But the fourth one stayed up. And that's what you're going to get, Lad, the strongest castle in all of England.
cellocgw at March 26th, 2014 17:14 — #6
I saw those 'before - after' pictures too, and it was pretty obvious that the slide area had slud (slidden?) several times before. If any pile of dirt was just itching to slide again, that was it. So take yr pick: Socialist government shoulda banned building houses downhill, or Libertarian gov't shoulda said "tough luck suckers, we ain't gonna dig you out."
OK, more seriously, I wonder how the insurance companies rated that development area.
maggiekb at March 31st, 2014 11:10 — #7
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.