The difference between this and Iraq’s WMD’s is that there was absolutely no evidence, whatsoever, of any WMDs.
Oh, there was so-called evidence that was presented, but it wasn’t properly vetted out, was it? And, we went to war based upon false information and lies. Why wait for hard evidence when we can profitably bomb the shit out of everything today, right?
How is the war profit machine’s misinformation any better than yours? You characterise the idea that chemical weapons have been used in Syria as a lie.
Look who’s talking? First of all, I was referring to all the hype that the only possibility is that it’s been the Syrian government using chemicals.
A rebel group affiliated with the Free Syrian Army is suspected to have used sarin gas as recently as March of this year. Why ignore that?
Your first link says, “high confidence assessment” – Ok, where’s the evidence beyond this assessment? And, where’s the hard evidence it’s the Syrian government?
You second link says, “experts say most of the reported attacks are now months old and there is a risk that evidence has been cleared up or has degraded.”
But, even more interesting is this part you left out… “Russia sides with its government ally in blaming the opposition. Western nations say all the evidence points to Mr Assad’s forces using the arms in “limited” quantities.”
Like I already said, there may have been a chemical attack, but we don’t know which side did it. You think a good, profitable bombing will help clear this up?
You think the rebels who have recruited child soldiers, eaten the hearts out of soldiers, carried out beheadings and are strongly suspected of already carrying out chemical attacks are to be trusted?
WHY? What’s your evidence of this?
Hating the war machine is only good when the war machine is selling you something immoral.
The poor, poor war machine. Somebody please think of the poor, innocent war machine.
ಠ_ಠ
There are plenty of videos of Syrian men, women and children’s bodies being destroyed by chemical agents.
By whose chemical agents?
Syria in an entirely different situation where over 100,000 people have already died because of our (the international community’s) inaction.
Last time I checked people have died because there’s a civil war. Do you also have a hard-on for us charging into the Congo?
Why not? Not enough fucking oil or profitable gas pipeline territory? I hope you put your money where your mouth is and lead the attack.
I am disappoint, Cow.
Look in the mirror.
Shall we profitably bomb the shit out of them? Will that help stabilize the situation like we did with Libya?
Human Rights Worse After Gaddafi
spare me your calls for hard evidence.
Wow… that says it all. People like you are doomed to repeat mistakes of the past. I hope you lead the attack, sweetheart. Don’t be yet another bloodthirsty chickenhawk.
Educate yourself:
Leaked docs:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/drive/share?ie=UTF8&s=G6_SxjA3RnEpXfvn8WZ8Aw#
Gen Wesley Clark Reveals US Plan To Invade Iraq, Syria …
HINT: It’s about the money…
