boingboing at October 17th, 2013 12:52 — #1
imb at October 17th, 2013 13:40 — #2
I'm guessing David's deviancy involves some baked goods. Just a hunch.
marjae at October 17th, 2013 13:45 — #3
I have heard that the book pushes pseudoscientific bigotry against trans people. Is this true? [From a short preview, the author doesn't seem to endorse the Bailey-Blanchard-Lawrence theory, but does surround the discussion with a good deal of othering and misgendering language.]
brainspore at October 17th, 2013 13:49 — #4
I'm pretty sure I would notice if there was a sexual deviant inside me.
Unless maybe he drugged me first.
imb at October 17th, 2013 13:57 — #5
Haven't heard anything about him before this mention here. Did you read a review and have a link?
I just read some info about him and by him in regard to the transgendered. I think I'll skip this podcast.
steampunkbanana at October 17th, 2013 14:43 — #6
nox at October 17th, 2013 19:25 — #8
The MP3 version is so poorly miked that it's incomprehensible.
How am I the first one commenting about this?
virginiallorca at October 17th, 2013 21:52 — #9
With half-hearted documentation, all I felt my purpose and style deserved, I wrote of the possible emotional and behavioral consequences of the particular architecture of male genitalia, in general, but never thought to explore so deeply the anatomical and biological implications or results. I kind of dabbled with the cultural and anthropological aspects, intending to be wry, but nevertheless presenting what I feel is a valid premise. No spam. You can find it if you want to.
technogeekagain at October 18th, 2013 01:39 — #10
(read it here, or go straight to the novels.)
spookiewon at October 18th, 2013 15:31 — #11
Personally, I don't really care what is "normal" or "deviant" or "perverted." What is illegal for adults should be what harms the person or property of a non-consenting other. Nothing more.
boingboing at October 22nd, 2013 12:52 — #12
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.