Look, I’m not saying I’m not interested in her Asimov… and let’s just take it as read that her Heinleins are all in order, but I’m a jaded guy of the internet age, so it’s hard for me to get that excited unless I can at least see whether she’s got any Vinge. And it just figures that the way they shot it, her Nagatas are just out of view.
(I’ve… I’ve taken this too far, haven’t I?)
I stand corrected. Is it art, however ?
That’s the owner, Bernie. Art just works there on weekends.
That costume doesn’t look so risqué from the front but the other side is opened to the Book of Revelations.
Rowr².
Squared, cause she’s the founder of a SF bookshop.
Of course it is. It’s a well composed and executed portrait of a human being literally embodying her passion and profession, and a photograph of an ideal female form besides. How is it not art?
Disappointed that the titles on the spines aren’t legible.
One could argue that she’s being objectified.
And something something male gaze something something.
Meh, I don’t feel like arguing. Neat idea.
Hello,
I shall be in my bunk library.
In all serious, pretty interesting photo. I wonder how difficult it is to line up so that everything looks right in the photo?
Ug. Clarke’s 2061 is a terrible book. That’s what we’re supposed to be looking at, right?
Any inspiration from Cindy Sherman?
It’s certainly commerce. It’s all about what this business sells. Can something be art and commerce at the same time? Sure, movies do it all the time. Yes. It’s Art. Among other things.
i love reading
A regular Library of Sexual Congress.
Because you are a boring drudge desperately looking for something to be offended by. If you want to see photos of naked male bodypainted bookstore owners, why haven’t you taken any yourself?
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
