Originally published at: http://boingboing.net/2017/01/06/a-handful-of-essential-ideas-f.html
…
This should be a compulsory part of the internet.
“Marginal versus average” (something can be good on average, but so bad at the margins that it’s a net negative);
This doesn’t make sense, does it? It’s pretty vague terms. So I can’t be sure.
Finance might create value on average, but be wasteful on the margin.
Gah! The OP said something rather different, but in no less wonky terms.
I think that Cory explained it poorly.
The linked article seems to be saying that “Marginal versus average” means that, for instance, if you can spend $100 on something and get a $5,000 benefit, but you’re actually spending $2,500 and getting a $5,000 benefit, the “average benefit” from each of those dollars spent is $2, but the “marginal benefit” from each dollar spent after the first $100 is zero.
Something can have a positive average benefit, but can the marginal benefits are so bad that it should be cut back or, at the very least, not expanded.
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.