Originally published at: https://boingboing.net/2020/02/27/a-new-play-lets-formerly-incar.html
…
Good story, Thom. Break a leg! This arbitrary censorship is a huge problem for books-through-bars programs (most of which are donation-funded & volunteer-run). These groups have to maintain fat rulebooks listing every individual prison in the country with their censorship quirks. If books are rejected by the prison mailroom staff, they are mailed back to the group, which thus has to pay postage both ways, doubling the costs. Private prisons are especially draconian as there’s no oversight at all.
I thought the more immediate concern was that the books would be used to smuggle things in, hence rules against used books. Long enough ago that it’s hazy, I do remember reading about rules requiring that books come new, from the publisher.
The weekend I spent in jail in 1979, there were copies of Johnny Cash’s “Man in Black” and of course Gideon bibles. When one of our group decided to keep his book because he’d not finished it, I said something about how he should leave it there for the prisoners remaining.
I do remember reading about rules requiring that books come new, from the publisher.
Yes, many (but not all) prisons require that books look brand-new & most require that they come from an “approved vendor.” Most books-through-bars programs work with a cooperating bookstore. But more & more prisons are requiring that books come new from Amazon. And some would like to ban books altogether.
I too have been incarcerated & the boredom was crushing. But beyond that, I think it’s important to remember that American prisons are just the latest version of the slavery system & American slaves have always been violently discouraged from reading.
Because for too many of us in the USA the cruelty is the point.
The book bans are not “arbitrary”. They’re carefully targeted.
—
The prison industrial-complex and legal / criminal justice system we have in the US (and how that intersects with how employment under capitalism works) is a total disaster and should be completely redesigned based on modern science, and continually updated as our empirical knowledge of reality is refined, to ensure the best social outcomes.
Hopefully this isn’t too off-topic, but I ran across this at some point and I thought it was an excellent piece of journalism:
Incidentally, there’s an obvious historical line between that and this:
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.