Originally published at: Adobe's new generative AI service has "ethical standards" - Boing Boing
…
3 Likes
Is this an AI generated definition of Ethical?
7 Likes
I suppose this is the best case scenario but for Adobe i can see how this decision was made in order to not give folks more reasons to avoid using their products.
Though i still wouldn’t use Photoshop because i’m sure as hell not renting a license from them.
7 Likes
Firefly reproduces non-public-domain, non-licensed images in 5…4…3…
But you have to give them credit for developing ethical standards to address the whole “burning down the planet in order to avoid paying a few artists” thing. They did that, right?
8 Likes
Given that Adobe admit that 5% of their training images are themselves AI generated (from sources such as Midjourney), i.e. they’re effectively pre-digested collections of images from outside the “ethical” source collection, this is, at best, semi-ethical (even assuming we accept their framing that the licensed image use is ethical, which…).
8 Likes
Ethics? adobe?!
It is to laugh…
10 Likes
This is the video generator release, there are other static media that have been out for a while (a year?). Mostly web/digital-targeted though, too low resolution for large print (although you can produce vector graphics, in RGB).
2 Likes
And because it’s a relatively easy decision to make if you literally own one of the world’s biggest stock photo libraries.
5 Likes
Adobe says “If you apply the shit to your skin with the nicest golden putty knives in the most uniform layer possible, you might be slightly better of than not smearing yourself with shit.”
Edit:autocorrect
1 Like
It’s fine - I bought this nazi lampshade secondhand
4 Likes
no it doesn’t, because it’s an AI content generator
2 Likes
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.
