The argument of how accepted science can all be explained away as bias, and we should be ready to accept just about any claim so long as it involves electric fields, is something you post about all the time. Without you being forthcoming about how you determine what you trust, I’m sure you don’t want to repeat the same again with me.
But I thought I should comment on this, because it is the sort of legend that propagates easily. Einstein read Worlds on Collision and offered his critical feedback, but it is easy enough to find this is a cheap story to make it seem important; the book was <a href=Was Einstein Reading "Worlds in Collision" When He Died? - JASON COLAVITO">not on his desk when he died.
Interesting that you bring it up, though; I wonder if it doesn’t finally say something about what you would prefer to peer-reviewed science.
