You´re calling it rather early, but I´m inclined to agree.
I canât beat this one. Even the nope badger (though that was close):
Along the same vein as the illustration:
Oh man. Iâm mostly internet-savvy, but the nope badger, well, did the creator of that get a unicorn? Because, you know, they deserve it.
I feel super terrible for laughing at that poor siamese. The cat is a dead ringer for my own derptastic kitteh.
I know. Iâve felt terrible about it for hours on endâŚ
Because itâs such a beautiful thing:
Bonus, the original footage/narration (includes a great slo-mo of the dive):
Someone does need to re-text the nope badger into Norwegian, though.
NĂPE??
Iâd guess NøP.
NøP! NøP! NøP! NøP! NøP! NøP!
Ăma Ăte!
Ăfcka Ăis
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
Ă
!
At least Iâm pretty sure thatâs what Google Translate would have come up with, if I tried it.
Like. Wow.
Thereâs too much âAmericas funniest home videosâ in there. Iâm not an econut, but animals getting hurt just doesnât cut it for me.
MUST we encourage the creation of these? i donât mind them when they are well done and used sparingly, but they keep growing in use and most are just so terrible. also, the one you chose for the header is awesome.
I donâ know⌠they are dumb and kind of silly, but hey, itâs the internet. I think there is room for both highminded discussions AND dumb gifs⌠So I sayâŚ
I could watch that like a million times overâŚ
The raccoon was attacking his dog.
But let us not forget and also pay humble homage to what first gave birth to the galaxy of gifs we know todayâŚ
That cat is my spirit animalâŚ
It owes me 0.50 $US royalty for implementing a trademarked crenquis move.
yeah well thatâs nature 
