So, one of the articles that I linked to, posted a mere fifteen months ago, talks about 12-year-old’s in Apple’s supply chain.
China Labor Watch, which regularly posts about habitually abusive employers like Apple and Samsung, released a report in 2012 that exposed Apple supplier Foxconn’s Yantai factory’s employment of children as young as 14 years old. The conditions in this infamously abusive factory were abysmal, leading to a spate of suicides a few years back and a series of riots, the latest of which was 18 months ago. As late as a mere 15 months ago (perhaps still ancient history according to @enso), conditions were indeed quite bad:
Overtime is supposed to be voluntary, but none of the [undercover] reporters were offered any choice. In addition to the excessive hours, one reporter had to attend unpaid meetings before and after work. Another reporter was housed in a dormitory where 12 workers shared a cramped room.
According to one researcher into abusive child and youth labor practices, Ross Perlin,
Foxconn is conspiring with government officials and universities in China to run what may be the world’s single largest internship program – and one of the most exploitative. Students at vocational schools – including those whose studies have nothing to do with consumer electronics – are literally forced to move far from home to work for Foxconn, threatened that otherwise they won’t be allowed to graduate. Assembling our iPhones and Kindles for meager wages, they work under the same conditions, or worse, as other workers in the Foxconn sweatshops.
Indeed, many of the students are paid less and the schools deduct a “commission” from their salaries. The internships are required for graduation and so this amounts to nothing less than conscripted labor. Although @enso believes that the onus is on Apple’s detractors to prove that Apple hasn’t spontaneously cleaned up their act in the last 15 months, I think that this is a ridiculous requirement, as these kinds of reports aren’t even that regular and it not only defies common sense but also recent history to assume the default position of believing that Apple has cleaned up its act.
It’s frankly naive to think that, given that these kinds of practices are common knowledge, that a company like Apple really has any ethics whatsoever. In fact their “ethics” are just part of what it takes to sell their abusively manufactured products to consumers who either aren’t bothered by abusive labor practices, or refusive to believe them. We all “have” to buy electronics, so I understand that these practices are difficult or impossible to get away from, but the only point I’m making is that we shouldn’t delude ourselves into valorizing these companies when they do something good because what they’re doing to the working classes of the world is violent and savage.