Remember that it isnât really Trump orchestrating the violent response to peaceful citizens: itâs someone with a lot more intelligence and self-discipline, who has done this many times before as part of his vision for America:
I donât agree with everything he says, but itâs good food for thought.
Cute, but that baby better watch out - theyâre marinating her! 
Furries fighting the good fight.
A few things jumped out at me while listening to this. Iâm not into the gun idea, mostly because it escalates and plays into the narrative of self-defense already being used by gun-wielding cops against unarmed people. The other thing is boycotts are difficult to maintain. With the target heâs chosen (and since businesses heâs asking people to patronize instead are few and far between), that makes it hard to sell.
Thereâs a big disconnect in his economic target, too. That particular industry has already been hit hard by the virus, so whatever influence he hopes to gain would be less than it mightâve been last year. The consequences should impact the bad actors. Why reward any business associated with guns by buying more of them? Why not bring the social and economic consequences to those directly responsible for killings and injustice?
âTo Serve Man Babiesâ
/cue Twilight Zone music
Valid points; those are two of my areas of concern as well.
Thread.
Wow, this takes me back to my own GS camp experience. The town where the story below happened is less than ten miles from the campgrounds:
Well. That didnât last very long.
Fuck that guy. Cowards, all of them.
âthe cop in me wants to kick my own ass,â
This is⌠extremely telling.
Sounds like the cop in him is an asshole. He should defund the cop in him!
