Comment-spammers threaten to sabotage their victims through Google Disavow if the evidence of their vandalism isn't removed

boing
21

Silly Tim, why are you wasting your time here. If you knew business you would be busy out there posting enough spam to make Google remove you from the search results.

You silly ignorant foolish girl.

My sisters husband had small penis find out how her husband made 9456.99 a week at home satisfying her woman parts.

3 Likes
22

I respectively request Gordon Sands to learn the difference between “respectively” and “respectfully”.
Also, it is because of the punctuation, of people like Gordon Sands, that commas are becoming, an endangered species.

2 Likes
23

Wait, someone back me up here: disavow seems to just mean that any external links to your site won’t be counted in page rank. The potential damage alluded to just means that if you stupidly decide to disavow links from legitimate sites (like I dunno, positive yelp reviews) you could throw the hyperlinked baby out with the SEO bath water.

It’s a nonissue, isn’t it?

4 Likes
24

I think I like his sexism use but with the counterpoint of being conscious enough to know that calling someone a “girl” goes too far. “Sensitive woman” treads such a weird space in namecalling that I think you should be honored to have received it.

You should totally make business cards. In fact, I’m going to run this by you, tell me what you think:

14 Likes
25

Thank you so much for the stickers for http://www.bankruptcyaction.com/

1 Like
26

Is there any mechanism that would prevent a competing business from using these new algorithm modifications against a competitor? It seems like that is an obvious problem.

1 Like
27

It only works for spam links from non-reputable sites so no.

This guy is an idiot and has no clue what’s actually and happening and what he’s threatening.

3 Likes
28

and looking further you need to have control over the Google webmasters control tools for that website since you need to verify you are the owner of the website to use the tools for that website again no.

29

First of all , dear http://www.bankruptcyaction.com/ ; your flag decal will NOT get you into heaven anymore !! second , how can you possibly justify a business model based upon getting $$ from people who have ’ proven ’ themselves unable to pay their bills ?!?!? thirdly , how is it possibly ethical to extort $$ from peepz who have none , or not enough to pay the bills that they already have run up ?? and so on and so forth !! strong comment of disdain and disparity and disparage to follow !!

1 Like
30

The Arkell v. Pressdram (1971) reply exists for the likes of Gordon Sands and bankruptcyaction.com

7 Likes
31

Gordon just stuck his macho penis into a hornet’s nest. Let the schadenfreude begin!

2 Likes
32

This thread has been the funnest one in quite a while

33

It pleases me to imagine the hornets responding to the penile intrusion, followed by a hive of Japanese honeybees piling on to the hornets.

Schadenfreude indeed!

1 Like
34

Well there’s a reason that lawyers specializing in personal bankruptcy usually demand their fees up front.

35

But people who can’t pay their bills are bad people, so it is extremely ethical to extort money from bad people!

1 Like
36

Wow, a sexist as well as a lackwit. He has no idea how much help he needs.

1 Like
37

Why would he think disavow means “screw over”? Oh yeah, he’s in the business of screwing over people trying to screw over their creditors by disavowing debts.

1 Like
38

Perfect use of the Squarespace logo design tool. You win at BoingBoing.

1 Like
39

What? I can’t believe it, I’ve never won at anything before. And I didn’t even enter! Thanks The_Tim! Thanks BoingBoing! Thanks America!
http://snyislanders.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/okposo-eagle-america-thanks-obama.png

2 Likes
40

You forgot to thank bankruptcyaction.com

1 Like