Thanks for responding
You addressed my points quite clearly yet I still go back to what you call white privilege and what I call hidden assumptions.
For example:
We already know that we cannot get every kid into the best school, if we have 10 schools, then weâve just excluded 90% of the population.
if we have 3 good schools, then weâve only excluded 70% of the population from what is considered a good education.
First round of questions: Why are there only three good schools? Are they better funded? Is it because of where they are located?
From this we already know that if early education is important, weâve doomed 70% of the population. If we are funding some schools because they have smart students then we are saying that the other kids deserve to be in a bad school. We may not mean to say it, but that is what we are doing.
Now, all these schools cant be equally terrible, if we have 3 schools that are better than the rest, then lets posit 4 schools that are just good, nothing special, you go there, you learn enough to go to the next level.
Second round of questions: Are kids that go to a "regular"school being done a disservice because the did not get into the best school? whatâs the difference between a good school and a great school in the same district? How many ârichâ kids go to these âregularâ schools?
Iâm guessing here, but Iâm pretty sure that the âbetterâ schools have all the rich kids in them, draw your own conclusions here. But if we grant that not sending your kid to the best school, and not sending him/her to the worst school either is a good compromise for parents that are poor then weâve only doomed 30% of kids to bad schools, ergo, to failure.
And if all the rich kids are in the better schools, (which isnât hard to imagine, you even grant that yourself since they have options), then it could be said, that in a way, rich people are limiting how many poor kids can get a leg up on education in the first place, so saying that âThere are definitely poor people who send their kids to the wealthier schools. Itâs not like the wealthier schools have exclusively wealthy populationsâ hides the false assumption that poor kids would fill 95% of the best school if only they would apply for it.
The hard truth is that you donât need to assume that people are not trying to get out of poverty to explain why they donât.
In fact, if we had a way of knowing how many jobs there are, and how much those jobs pay, we would know whoâs poor and who isnât, because the last hidden assumption made here is that not every kid can grow up to be a CEO, and not every kid can grow up to be a teacher, and not every kid can grow up to be a manager, or a janitor, we only require so many.
In this way, we require a certain amount of people to be poor. Think about that.