Pretty much… That’s one of the points about being sovereign (and having your currency be the world’s reserve to boot); the deal is for $X denominated in USD and that’s what the creditors get. Unless, that is, they want to contest it through a show of force - about 9/10ths of international law is the law of the jungle…
Anyway, the narrative we’ve been seeing vis a vis the US debt and China is grossly simplified. I’m not sure if the debt is sovereign to sovereign or sovereign to corporate or corporate to corporate. That is, is it the US government owing money to the Chinese government, US corporations owing money to Chinese corporations, US government to Chinese corporations or US corporations to Chinese government? All I know about it is the absurdly large dollar amount that’s been bandied about, but exactly what debt it is will affect exactly what happens.
It was to play neoliberal games, actually. But this is a very very common World Bank/IMF recommendation for countries going through debt crises: “Sell off everything except your Parliament (if we could demand that too, we would, but…)” It usually ends in tears.
Forget that - there’s not even a mechanism for exiting the Euro in the first place. The treaties that set it up intend it to be perpetual…
Yet federal nation-states routinely deal with this kind of thing; think Mississippi vs Texas or California in terms of surpluses being recycled within a political union. I think you kind of nailed it when you said in the other post:
That was true a while back; I’m not sure it’s true anymore… More to the point, Greece’s banking system is bust. It needs all kinds of life support to get back on track. As much as you may hate the banksters, the system they run actually is too big to fail…
That sounds a hell of a lot like the lobster bucket: “we had to suffer, so you bloody well do too”. Which is actually what this is.
Remember, after 2008, Greece’s GDP sank the most of all the Euro nations. Way more than any of the other countries hit by austerity. That’s partly affected their ability to complete any meaningful reforms. For example, effective tax collection needs an effective tax collection system, which takes money - to hire people, mostly. But if you’re going to cut government spending in the short term in the name of austerity, there’s no way you’re going to have the number of tax inspectors you need.