Are you questioning my reading comprehension or trying to make an argument.
If you are trying to make an argument it would be helpful to introduce some evidence into the conversation.
There. is. absolutely. no. evidence. that Sanders would have won against Trump. It is a belief which Cory and many others on BB vehemently defend. However this does not make it true.
I am happy to engage in a reasoned argument, but not really happy to be patronised by adults behaving like a mid-tantrum-feet-stamping toddler, which is what you are doing here:
Let me respond with evidence:
POC are underrepresented in the US electoral system. This has been the case historically, by design and is increasingly the case do to demographics & GOP legislative efforts.
The fact that a black man of mixed racial heritage who culturally is not African American has been elected President after five decades of civil rights movement doesn’t prove anything except that change in US politics happens at a glacier speed.
Trump has proven his racist credentials over four decades: As a landlord and as a vigilante who incited violence towards the Central Park Five. He was a racist candidate and he is a racist president. He was elected because of his racism not in spite. And yes, after Obama there has been a unsurprising racist backlash.
94% of Black Women voted for HRC and they haven’t got many good things to say about Sanders which is kind of interesting?
EDIT: to add HRC was and is standing for something: Women. And she has realised legislative changes which have benefitted women and children.
How about standing for something and doing something about what you stand for. Does that count?