That’s a laugh. Like someone else noted here, I would likely disagree with his entire world view, but at least he wasn’t a dumbass.
Brooks is trying to put a foot (after removing from mouth) on each side of the fence here with his mention of younger David toking but older David scolding.
I dunno if you can call a paper that helped mislead the public into the invasion of Iraq by printing government lies at face value part of the “liberal media,” so maybe it’s a double-bluff!
“See, we have an idiot conservative, we CAN’T be willing servants of conservative agenda items!”
I think Mr Grinspoon was just trying to be polite and/or charitable. Either that, or he’s had the good fortune to not be exposed to Brooks’ horseshit before.
Yeah it’s a fucking joke but I think that is what the NYT likes to believe. He’s a total milktoast in my opinion.
You know, despite giving you the munchies, it doesn’t feel like pot usually makes people fat. I certainly don’t know anyone who has.
I’ve never managed to gain any weight from smoking, even though I get bigger munchies than anyone I know. I normally don’t have a very big appetite, but when I smoke weed… it’s ridiculous. I get obsessed with unhealthy food - it tastes so good - and I can eat a box of cookies, a bag of honey-coated nuts, half a bundt cake and bunch of ice cream all in one sitting, and that’s on top of regular meals.
Yet I’ve stayed skinny. I think the biggest reason is that when you smoke regularly, the munchies get smaller and smaller until you barely get them at all. These days I smoke only every now and then, only a few weeks at a time. I’ll eat like crazy during that period, but when I stop, my appetite disappears almost completely and I’ll eat so little that I quickly lose whatever few kilos I’ve managed to gain.
And regarding driving high… well, I certainly wouldn’t recommend it. But it’s nothing like driving drunk. Drunk people get reckless and over-confident, but when you’re high, you become cautious and nervous. I would never in a million years trust myself to drive while high, but I used to regularly drive around with a friend who almost always drove drunk, and never made a single mistake. But even if it doesn’t affect some people as much, I think it’s better to just say that driving high should be illegal. Better to not take any chances.
I wouldn’t say that. More dangerous, yes, and it affects your motor skills more when you drink enough, but “much stronger”… I don’t know. Everyone has their own idea of what strong even means in relation to drugs, of course.
Even though I feel clear as a day when I’m on opiates (I actually feel like the person I’m supposed to be), I still think they’re stronger drugs than things like weed or alcohol, which make me feel more “messed up”. I guess one way to explain it is that alcohol feels much “dirtier” than many other drugs - I can get some fun feelings out of it, but they always come with a bunch of unnecessary effects and the fun parts seem to drown in the sea of fuzziness. Weed is more effective at what it does and what I want out of it, and opiates target the right recepors very strongly like nothing else does, without anything unnecessary.
(This went completely off topic - I mostly wanted to see if I can explain to myself what I’m going for.)
True, it’s of course very subjective. Dosage also makes a (pretty important) difference.
But as a demonstration head out into the streets of Amsterdam on a Saturday night and tell me who you think is more intoxicated
I read that column the day it came out and found myself thinking two things: 1) The essay was insulting and baseless to a high degree, and 2) I hope to hell BB gets a hold of this and shreds it as it should be utterly shredded. It was a laughable read that only served to underline Brooks’ lack of knowledge on the subject and it’s nice to see many others calling it out.
yeah i agree, that’s why the quotes. i’m sure they would like to think of themselves on the left - clearly though they are the #1 mouthpiece for american policies, if not the government itself.
Matt Taibbi does a good job as well in his RS blog.
Dose matters as well, that’s true. For me, it takes a while to get really drunk (I don’t really enjoy being very drunk, anyway), while I only need a few hits to be really high. Other people are affected differently.
But I agree with you that drunk people are a lot more obnoxious and usually more messed up. Most times, you can’t even tell when someone is high.
This pretty much sums it all up:
I never thought that I nor the universe would reach a state where it’s possible to say, “Gosh I miss William F. Buckley, Jr.”
Yeah, seriously, I feel the same way. I wish I would have appreciated him more when he was alive because I thought he was a total prick at the time. Now he seems positively sane and nowadays sanity seems like such a high bar for the Republicans.
Not a bit, personally. He was the grandfather of modern wingnut punditry, putting a pseudo-intellectual gloss on unapologetic racism.
He apparently knows how to work the system. Most people provide frequent outbursts of idiotic opinion for free, and he gets paid for his…
Do you think our two statements are mutually exclusive?
This topic was automatically closed after 5 days. New replies are no longer allowed.