42% Young Earth Creationists? I’m not saying that’s impossible, but can I get a citation? I grew up in bumblefuck Michigan and weird sectarian versions of evangelicalism were really strong in my hometown, but despite knowing a bunch of those people, I know very few young earth creationists.
My point wasn’t that the Treaty of Versailles shouldn’t be considered unfair - “The Sleepwalkers” did a lot to balance the historical perspective. Rather, I wanted to focus on the issue that, justified or not, “being hard done by/not treated fairly” (as a nation) and “its the left/minorities wot’s done us wrong” where used as rallying cries.
Trump has other personality traits which make him incredibly dangerous, primarily his way of accusing “the system”/“shadowy forces” to be behind every setback. Erdogan seems to be his soulmate (also with regard to his taste in interior decoration), and I think Trump will go down that road. The moment we’ll see a serious Dem contender we’ll be the moment he’ll go full Nixon on him, and more.
True.
But there are always as many national causes as there are people in a given nation. And if you make them overlap nicely, you control the whole nation.
- “let’s make Germany great again, dominate Europe, and get rid of the Jews”.
- “let’s make Germany great again and make sure all Germans get to live in the German Empire - bring them Heim ins Reich”
- “our nation is at war - however much we disagree with that dictator, now we have to stand by our nation” (that’s what I was referring to earlier).
- “our nation is losing the war - the war was wrong at first, but now we have to defend our home to keep it from falling into enemy hands”
- “the allies are invading. The Russians are more likely to rape my sister/daughter/mother, so lets delay them on the eastern front”.
Number 1 - that’s the hollywood-style Nazis. Really nasty. In power.
Number 2 - they’d be Nazis, too. They are more numerous. In 1934, they did not imagine the Holocaust. They might even still have been appalled by the idea if they heard about it in 1934.
Number 3 - I’m afraid America has plenty of those people, too.
I suspect that dictators start wars because with the support of groups 1 + 2 + 3, it is much easier to secure your power than with 1 + 2 alone.
Group 3 is comprised of decent people, yet they are the ones that I’m most afraid of. In 1939, they were the ones who “made Germany great” and allowed Group 1 to commit genocide.
In 2003, they were the ones who allowed GWB to illegally invade Iraq and cause the avoidable deaths of half a million people. Many of them are part of the US armed forces now, ready to fight Trump’s wars should the need arise. And many more are standing by to “Support the Troops”.
Wait, what? Why shouldn’t they? Politicians routinely communicate with like-minded politicians from other countries. I dislike Putin (among other reasons) because he’s the kind of the politician who would associate with Trump and with Austrian right-wing politicians, not because he’s Russian.
The people from Group 3 I mentioned above would of course start supporting Trump once it became known that the anti-Trump opposition was communicating with foreign governments (“Dear 习近平, please hold of on nuclear retaliation for another month, we might manage to impeach Trump by then”).
Fortunately, we still don’t know that just because Hitler wasn’t taken seriously enough, the same is true for Trump. Politicians who sound worse than they are do exist.
I’ll keep hoping. Because if Trump is worse than he sounds, I’d better get those extra beds ready for my American relatives, should they make it out in time. And maybe start building a fallout shelter.
Yep: You don’t have to be an anti-Semite to make common cause with anti-Semites. The danger doesn’t isn’t that people subscribe wholeheartedly to Trump’s platform, but rather the “America does need shaking up, and he won’t be able to do anything serious anyway” crowd.
Gallup tracks this:
Light green=YEC
I think this election has proven that America’s biggest problem is education. Anybody properly educated about history would not vote for Trump. And although many of his voters were, in fact, college educated, I believe that they had a poor college education. Even the simplest, shallowest understanding of economics would tell you that there is literally no way Trump is going to magically replace manufacturing jobs that robots, not China and Mexico, have taken away.
Thank you. I probably shouldn’t be surprised, but I am.
Except it’s not like anti-semitism was new in European politics at the time. The Dreyfus affair in France was FRESH in the public imagination, for example. There was a long history of ignoring or downplaying antisemitism in European politics.
[ETA] And now it’s ignoring or downplaying Islamophobia…
Really? Do you think that Peter Thiel isn’t properly educated? Or Trump’s team? Or the right wing elite?
What does that mean? Properly educated?
systemic racism & sexism
voter suppression
apathy
a lack of class solidarity, empathy and communication
its electoral system
presidential candidates who don’t run very good campaigns
Do you know who else was a vegetarian?
I liked what springer had to say…
What kind of fucked up world is it when Jerry Springer has something reasonable to say.
I wanted to respond to some who have mentioned Christian rapturists as a concern. The rapture theory has actually been dwindling in Christianity for some time now, in favor of Christian dominionism, which holds that the church is meant to gain control of governments, “return” the world to a Christian worldview and enact laws based on the Bible. It is thought that this will bring the world to a condition where Christ will return.
The dominionists are hostile to the rapturists, calling them “escapist” and mocking their views. The dominionist view has made huge gains in the evangelical church. There are varying degrees of the view, probably many who don’t realize this is what they are following.
To see how this worldview affects the religious right, google ‘Christian dominionist politicians’ or a similar phrase.
This election has split the Christian church pretty deeply. Some are frustrated with the hypocrisy of Christian leaders who were anxious to push Trump, others are convinced he is “God’s choice.” Franklin Graham made a statement after the election saying that Trump won because “God showed up” at the polls, in other words, it was a supernatural victory.
What comment precisely are you referring too? I think the only reference I’ve seen to “rapturists” has been in regards to policy on Israel. Plenty of people have mentioned dominionists, either directly or by inference.
You can find the New York Times article in-full here: NEW POPULAR IDOL RISES IN BAVARIA in their official archives. Just sharing in case anyone doubts the authenticity.
I have always liked him. While his show was a circus show of base entertainment that wasn’t my thing per se he always tried to end it on a good note and he never pretended that the show was anything other than stupid entertainment.
Seriously?
I think this election has proven that America’s biggest problem is education. Anybody properly educated about history would not vote for Trump. And although many of his voters were, in fact, college educated, I believe that they had a poor college education. Even the simplest, shallowest understanding of economics would tell you that there is literally no way Trump is going to magically replace manufacturing jobs that robots, not China and Mexico, have taken away.