I was trying to write “sex : gender :: pig : pork” without the spaces, but this got emojified to
sex:gender:pork
Escaping with backslashes doesn’t seem to give me what I want, either:
sex:gender:pork
Is this possible?
I was trying to write “sex : gender :: pig : pork” without the spaces, but this got emojified to
sex:gender:pork
Escaping with backslashes doesn’t seem to give me what I want, either:
sex:gender:pork
Is this possible?
one clumsy way:
sex:gender::pig:pork
sex:gender::­pig:pork
there’s also
sex꞉gender꞉꞉pig꞉pork
sex꞉gender꞉꞉pig꞉pork
(Unicode ‘MODIFIER LETTER COLON’ U+A789)
or
sex:gender::
pig:pork
sex:gender\
::`pig:pork`
Not sure if there’s a saner way.
Ick, I guess ­ is the best of those options.
Of course, now I just had to type ­ as &­shy;
Nothing like co-worker s IMing you MAC addresses with in the middle
Another common problem on some boards:
There’s also the suboptimal:
sex:gender::pig:pork
sex:gender::<m>pig:pork
Also you can use the colon HTML entity:
sex:gender:pork
sex:gender::pig:pork
Pretty much any HTML chunk (even invalid) that doesn’t render will stop the parser.
On a totally unrelated note, whoah!
button
<kbd>button</kbd>
“Backticks” work if you don’t mind the fixed-width font:
`sex:gender::pig:pork
` → sex:gender::pig:pork
And as I edit this post I see also that a <dd>
block magically disables emoji:
<dd> sex:gender::pig:pork </dd>
So if you wanted something indented anyway, that would be convenient.
Now I’m wondering just how escapes are intended to be used on discourse. Because if I type \<foo\>
it seems to get discarded completely:
<foo>
That must mean escapes are processed before html? Unexpected.
So far, the only thing I’m pretty sure \ escapes correctly is \ itself.
Curiouser and curiouser! I think I would have used fixed width in that instance if I had intuited what the </>
icon meant.
The parser’s open source if you want to read through some semi-complex JS libs. I dredged through it some in the past when I was curious about some stuff.
I tend to just use backticks or ­
to break the parser if I don’t want the grey background.
I see the <dl>
tag has the same effect without indenting:
<dl> sex:gender::pig:pork </dl>
<dd> sex:gender::pig:pork </dd>
There may also be something relevant among the many frightening experiments in formatting at the so-called BBS Style Manual.
link fixed
I’m starting to think some of this might just be unexpected interplay between various plugins.
spoiled kbd
kbd’ed spoiler
Thank you @nemomen and @smulder! A gift:
. ,.
T."-._..---.._,-"/|
l|"-. _.v._ (" |
[l /.'_ \; _~"-.`-t
Y " _(o} _{o)._ ^.|
j T ,-<v>-. T ]
\ l ( /-^-\ ) ! !
\. \. "~" ./ /c-..,__
^r- .._ .- .-" `- . ~"--.
> \. \
] ^. \
3 . "> . Y
,.__.--._ _j \ ~ . ; |
( ~"-._~"^._\ ^. ^._ I . l
"-._ ___ ~"-,_7 .Z-._ 7" Y ; \ _
/" "~-(r r _/_--._~-/ / /,.--^-._ / Y
"-._ '"~~~>-._~]>--^---./____,.^~ ^.^ !
~--._ ' Y---. \./
~~--._ l_ ) \
~-._~~~---._,____..--- \
~----"~ \
\
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.