Kill women who have abortions, says National Review reporter

[goodpasture]

You also said:

@robulus

I’m really struggling to continue to believe that you don’t agree with him, like lockstep.

And also:

@robulus

You appear to be invested in his point of view. I could be reading you wrong, but it seems unlikely.

[robulus]

Seriously, the entire transcript of what you said and what I said starts a mere 50 posts up. Lets leave it at that, eh?

[goodpasture]

I’d say that’s fine with me, but you wouldn’t believe me anyway

[anon68952647]

@Andrew_Glasgow

If Verizon gives me a 10% discount on my phone bill, that’s something they’re giving me.

not when the service is optional. This line seems to totally go against your previous sentiment.

[anon67050589]

@Andrew_Glasgow

If Verizon gives me a 10% discount on my phone bill, that’s something they’re giving me.

No, it means there’s something they’ve been taking from you and for some reason they’ve decided to take less.

If someone hits you every day, 10 times a day, and then one week they start hitting you only 9 times a day…what exactly are they “giving” you?

[Brainspore]

@goodpasture

That’s Williamson’s argument, not mine. I don’t know how viable it is, though from a little cursory Googling, I don’t think it’s that far fetched.

Don’t be so modest:

@goodpasture

It’s not 100% effective now, sure, but both Williamson and I said “soon.” It’s not impossible to imagine that, within the next decade, scientific advances will make pregnancy a matter of opting in rather than opting out.

(Emphasis mine.)

[goodpasture]

Yeah, genius, I was paraphrasing his argument.

[shaddack]

@anon67050589

If someone hits you every day, 10 times a day, and then one week they start hitting you only 9 times a day…what exactly are they “giving” you?

…a break?